Is there an anticholinergic effect of drugs beyond polypharmacy? A simulation study on death, dementia, and delirium in UK Biobank
Mur, J.; Stirland, L. E.; Muniz-Terrera, G.; Leist, A. K.
Show abstract
The use of anticholinergic drugs has been associated with adverse health outcomes. However, their effects cannot be completely separated from the effects of general polypharmacy using standard methods. The objective of this study was to explore the extent to which the detrimental health effects attributed to anticholinergic burden measured by anticholinergic burden scales (ABS) were distinct from those of polypharmacy. We compared observed effects of ABS against simulated effects of generated pseudoscales intended to measure polypharmacy using UK Biobank primary care data. We randomly sampled from 525 anticholinergic and non-anticholinergic drugs prescribed in the year 2015 to [~]200,000 participants with an average age of 65 years. We then created 1,000 pseudoscales, the score of which was designed to represent the strength of the background effect of polypharmacy, differentiating pseudoscales constructed to capture either general polypharmacy or putative anticholinergic polypharmacy, and exhibiting similar distributional properties to 23 real-world ABS (statistical equivalence). We performed individual logistic regressions for each scale to estimate associations between ABS scales and pseudoscales, respectively, and risk of death, dementia, or delirium. Across outcomes, odds ratios for anticholinergic-polypharmacy pseudoscales were on average 0.03-0.05 greater than those of general-polypharmacy pseudoscales. The number of drugs composing the scales was correlated with the size of adverse effects for both pseudoscales (r=[~]0.5, p<0.001) and ABS (r=[~]0.7, p<0.001). In total, 50-90% of ABS showed stronger effects than the majority of pseudoscales. ABS exhibited stronger associations with the studied adverse health outcomes than would be expected from polypharmacy alone (range of differences in odds ratios: -0.05 to 0.20). Most existing ABS capture more variance in the association with death, dementia, and delirium than polypharmacy alone, but with varying degrees of strength.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- People exposed to proton pump inhibitors shortly preceding COVID-19 diagnosis are not at an increased risk of subsequent hospitalizations and mortality: a nation-wide matched cohort study 95%
- Calcium Channel Blockers: clinical outcome associations with reported pharmacogenetics variants in 32,000 patients 92%
- Antihypertensive Medications and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality: Population-based Case-Control Analysis in the United Kingdom 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning guided association of adverse drug reactions with in vitro target-based pharmacology 94%
- A systematic analysis of the contribution of genetics to multimorbidity and comparisons with primary care data 90%
- Multi-ancestry omic Mendelian randomization revealing putative drug targets of COVID-19 severity 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventable deaths involving medicines in England and Wales, 2013-22: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 93%
- Unveiling the Hidden Toll of Drug-Induced Impulsivity: A Network Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System 92%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The adverse impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and management in England, Scotland and Wales: A population-scale analysis of trends in medication data 94%
- Attributes and predictors of Long-COVID: analysis of COVID cases and their symptoms collected by the Covid Symptoms Study App 90%
- Psychiatric disorders and self-harm across 26 adult cancers: cumulative burden, temporal variation, excess years of life lost and unnatural causes of deaths 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 92%
- COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: two prospective observational cohort studies 91%
- Nationwide prediction of type 2 diabetes comorbidities 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.