Back

Untargeted proteomics enables ultra-rapid variant prioritization in mitochondrial and other rare diseases

Hock, D. H.; Caruana, N. J.; Semcesen, L. N.; Lake, N. J.; Formosa, L. E.; Amarasekera, S. S.; Stait, T.; Tregoning, S.; Frajman, L. E.; Robinson, D. R.; Ball, M.; Reljic, B.; Ryder, B.; Wallis, M. J.; Vasudevan, A.; Beck, C.; Peters, H.; Lee, J.; MitoMDT Diagnostic Network for Genomics and Omics, ; Karlaftis, V.; Attard, C.; Monagle, P.; Samarasinghe, A.; Brown, R.; Bi, W.; Lek, M.; McFarland, R.; Taylor, R. W.; Ryan, M. T.; Stark, Z.; Christodoulou, J.; Compton, A. G.; Thorburn, D. R.; Stroud, D. A.

2024-08-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.08.06.24311318 medRxiv
Show abstract

Only half of individuals with suspected rare diseases receive a definitive genetic diagnosis following genomic testing. A genetic diagnosis allows access to appropriate patient care and reduces the number of potentially unnecessary interventions and related healthcare costs. Here, we demonstrate that an untargeted quantitative mass-spectrometry approach quantifying >6,000 proteins in primary fibroblasts representing >80% of known mitochondrial disease genes can provide functional evidence for 83% of individuals in a cohort of known primary mitochondrial diseases. We profiled >90 individuals, including 28 with confirmed disease and diagnosed 6 individuals with variants in both nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Lastly, we developed an ultra-rapid proteomics pipeline using minimally invasive peripheral blood mononuclear cells to support upgrade of variant pathogenicity in as little as 54 hours in critically ill infants with suspected mitochondrial disorders. This study supports the integration of a single untargeted proteomics test into routine diagnostic practice for the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders in clinically actionable timelines, offering a paradigm shift for the functional validation of genetic variants.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.