Syncing Strategy and Execution: A Systematic Review of Public Health Preparedness Policy Implementation
Swint, J.; Zhang, W.; Marrison, A.; Gabriel, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe gap between public health preparedness and response policies and their practical implementation remains a critical challenge in global health security. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on barriers to effective policy implementation and identifies strategies for bridging this policy- practice gap. MethodsWe systematically searched six electronic databases for peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2023 focusing on the implementation of public health preparedness and response policies. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and AMSTAR-2. ResultsOf 2,456 initially identified studies, 87 met the inclusion criteria. Studies addressed various public health emergencies, including infectious disease outbreaks (n=41, 47.1%), natural disasters (n=23, 26.4%), and man-made disasters (n=8, 9.2%). Key barriers to policy implementation included organizational factors (76 studies, 87.4%), resource constraints (72 studies, 82.8%), and communication challenges (68 studies, 78.2%). Promising strategies for bridging the gap included adaptive management approaches (38 studies, 43.7%), participatory policy development (35 studies, 40.2%), and integrated information systems (31 studies, 35.6%). Only 23 studies (26.4%) were assessed as high quality, with limited quantitative evidence on strategy effectiveness. ConclusionsWhile several promising strategies for bridging the policy-practice gap have been identified, there is a critical need for more rigorous evaluations of their effectiveness. Future research should focus on organizational reforms, flexible resource allocation, and leveraging emerging technologies to enhance policy implementation in public health preparedness and response.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities 95%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 94%
- A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: a health workers' perspective 93%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 94%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 94%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 94%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does WASH FIT improve water, sanitation, and hygiene and related health impacts in healthcare facilities? A systematic review 94%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 91%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.