The Interaction Effects of Age, Sex, APOE and Common Health Risk Factors on Human Brain Functions
Li, T.; Chen, J.; Zhao, B.; Chen, H.; Yuan, C.; Garden, G. A.; Giovanello, K. S.; Wu, G.; Zhu, H.
Show abstract
ImportanceNonlinear changes in brain function during aging are shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including sex, age, genetics, and modifiable health risk factors. However, the combined effects and underlying mechanisms of these factors on brain functional connectivity remain poorly understood. ObjectiveTo comprehensively investigate the combined associations of sex, age, APOE genotypes, and ten common modifiable health risk factors with brain functional connectivities during aging. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis analysis used data from 36,630 UK Biobank participants, aged 44-81, who were assessed for sex, age, APOE genotypes, 10 health risk factors, and brain functional connectivities through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Main Outcomes and MeasuresBrain functional connectivities were evaluated through within- and between-network functional connectivities and connectivity strength. Associations between risk factors and brain functional connectivities, including their interaction effects, were analyzed. ResultsHypertension, BMI, and education were the top three influential factors. Sex-specific effects were also observed in interactions involving APOE4 gene, smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, BMI, and education. Notably, a negative sex-excessive alcohol interaction showed a stronger negative effect on functional connectivities in males, particularly between the dorsal attention network and the language network, while moderate alcohol consumption appeared to have protective effects. A significant negative interaction between sex and APOE4 revealed a greater reduction in functional connectivity between the cingulo-opercular network and the posterior multimodal network in male APOE4 carriers. Additional findings included a negative age-BMI interaction between the visual and dorsal attention networks, and a positive age-hypertension interaction between the frontoparietal and default mode networks. Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings highlight significant sex disparities in the associations between age, the APOE-{varepsilon}4 gene, modifiable health risk factors, and brain functional connectivity, emphasizing the necessity of jointly considering these factors to gain a deeper understanding of the complex processes underlying brain aging.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional patterns of human cortex development correlate with underlying neurobiology 95%
- Functional Connectivity Development along the Sensorimotor-Association Axis Enhances the Cortical Hierarchy 95%
- Spinal cord structural and functional architecture and its shared organization with the brain across the adult lifespan 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of 18 months lifestyle intervention on brain age assessed with resting-state functional connectivity 96%
- Individual variations in Brain age relate to early life factors more than to longitudinal brain change 95%
- Tracing the development and lifespan change of population-level structural asymmetry in the cerebral cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Life-course neighbourhood deprivation and brain structure in older adults: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 95%
- Three major dimensions of human brain cortical ageing in relation to cognitive decline across the 8th decade of life. 94%
- Genetic architecture of brain age and its casual relations with brain and mental disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The interaction between endogenous GABA, functional connectivity and behavioral flexibility is critically altered with advanced age 94%
- Linking structural and functional changes during aging using multilayer brain network analysis 94%
- Maturational networks of fetal brain activity reveal emerging connectivity patterns prior to ex-utero exposure 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.