Back

Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of 173 patients with extremely rare pathogenic mutations who applied for experimental antisense oligonucleotide treatment

Crooke, S. T.; Cole, T. A.; Carroll, J. B.; Gleeson, J. G.; Mignon, L.; Douville, J.; Chung, W.; Bain, J.; Berry-Kravis, E. M.; Leung, N.; Demarest, S.; McCourt, E.; Watt, A.; Powers, B.; Ngongang, C.

2024-08-06 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.08.05.24310862 medRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in "omics" technologies allow for the identification of an increasing number of individuals with diseases caused by nano-rare mutations. These difficult-to-diagnose individuals are uniquely disadvantaged and pose significant challenges to healthcare systems and society. Despite having diseases caused by actionable single gene mutations, in many cases, there is no commercial path for treatments for such small patient populations. We have defined nano-rare mutations as, mutations with a known worldwide prevalence <30. Since antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology has proven to be suited to address the needs of a portion of these patients, the n-Lorem Foundation is establishing an industrialized approach that couples detailed genotypic and phenotypic data to the immediate potential for ASO therapy. In this manuscript we have leveraged our experience in assessing the causality of nano-rare genetic variants and associated proximal molecular pathological events to attempt a correlation between detailed genetic data with patient specific phenotypic observations in 173 nano-rare individuals from diverse age groups evaluated for experimental ASO therapy. We found that the time required to achieve a molecular diagnosis varies from 1 month to 36 years, with the mean and median times from symptom onset to diagnosis estimated to be 4.32 years and 2 years, respectively. Amongst submitted cases there is a significant bias toward neurological diseases, with diverse genes and functional families involved and a marked preponderance of mutations in ion channel genes. The variability in phenotypic expression associated with nano-rare variants in genes such as GNAO1, H3F3A, GBE1, UBTF, or PACS1 clearly supports previous observations that phenotypes associated with same variants in the same gene can vary. We also observe that different, but functionally equivalent variants can result in both similar (e.g., TARDBP) and different phenotypes (e.g., GNAO1). Despite the relatively small size of the patient population investigated, this first compilation of its kind allows a variety of insights into the genotype and phenotype relationships in nano-rare conditions. Moreover, we show that our unique patient population presents a remarkable opportunity to apply "modern omics" approaches to begin to understand the various homeostatic, compensatory, and secondary effects of these genetic variants on the networks that result in expression of their unique phenotypes. To provide a more detailed description of the processes involved to provide a personalized antisense medicine, we have included nonclinical and clinical data on three exemplary patients who display disease in three different organs, the CNS, the eye and the kidney and are treated with ASOs of different designs. In contrast to traditional drug development, each patient presents unique genomic, ASO design, clinical treatment and management and evaluation challenges.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
9
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
23
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
29
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%