Geometry representations along visual pathways in human spatial navigation
Zeng, T.; Cai, M. B.
Show abstract
The representation of geometric structures of ones surroundings is key to self-localization during human spatial navigation. However, the spatial organization of geometry representation in the visual system has not been fully characterized. By modeling the synchronized brain activity from participants watching navigational videos from identical realistic virtual environments under different weather and lighting conditions, we found a compact representation of egocentric 3D scene geometric structures is present in a widespread network of brain regions. These regions carrying geometry-related signals form three parallel pathways, which we collectively refer to as "geometry visual pathways", starting from the primary visual cortex: the dorsal and medial pathways end in the intraparietal areas, while the ventral pathway arrives at the hippocampus via the parahippocampal gyrus. The synchronized neural activity in the identified geometry visual pathways allows for reliable decoding of the 3D scene geometric structures. Furthermore, road types, a more abstract representation of the route geometry, are encoded in overlapping pathways, distinctly absent from early visual cortex (V1, V2, V3). In addition to complementing the classical "what" and "where" dichotomy, the identified brain-wide geometry visual pathways narrow a critical gap in understanding how the brain constructs cognitive maps from visual inputs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The representational hierarchy in human and artificial visual systems in the presence of object-scene regularities 96%
- Variation in the geometry of concept manifolds acrosshuman visual cortex 95%
- Dynamic Predictive Coding: A Model of Hierarchical Sequence Learning and Prediction in the Neocortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.