Back

Biophysical Simulation Enables Multi-Scale Segmentation and Atlas Mapping for Top-Down Spatial Omics of the Nervous System

Mohammed Ali, L. K.; Yim, A. K. Y.; Nguyen, T.; Tu, N. K.; Gerbi, E. B.; Grigore, D.; Waligorski, J. E.; Kremitzki, C. L.; Mitra, R. D.; Milbrandt, J. D.; Buchser, W. J.

2024-08-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.02.605366 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial omics (SO) has produced high-definition mapping of subcellular molecules (like transcripts or proteins) within tissue samples. Mapping transcripts to anatomical regions requires segmentation, but even segmenting nuclei remains challenging for tissues like nerve cross sections, let alone for larger regions such as within the spinal cord. Neural networks could address this but need extensive human annotations--a bottleneck. We present SiDoLa-NS (Simulate, Dont Label - Nervous System), an image-driven (top-down) approach to SO analysis in the nervous system. We utilize biophysical properties of tissue architectures to design synthetic images mimicking tissue samples. With these in silico samples, we train supervised instance segmentation convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for nucleus segmentation, achieving precision and F1-scores > 0.95. We take this a step further with generalizable CNNs that can identify macroscopic tissue structures in the mouse brain (mAP50 = 0.869), spinal cord (mAP50 = 0.96), and pig sciatic nerve (mAP50 = 0.995). Short SummaryThe SiDoLa-NS micro-, meso-, and macro-scale models are generalizable, supervised CNNs for neuronal segmentation in cell to tissue-level contexts. SiDoLa-NS is novel in its combination of three core ideas: it is top-down (image first), trained solely on synthetic images, and it is multi-scale. The tool is validated on brain, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve for advanced segmentation tasks.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.