Back

Transitions in lung microbiota landscape associate with distinct patterns of pneumonia progression

Sumner, J. T.; Pickens, C. I.; Huttelmaier, S.; Moghadam, A. A.; Abdala-Valencia, H.; NU SCRIPT Study Investigators, ; Hauser, A. R.; Seed, P. C.; Wunderink, R. G.; Hartmann, E. M.

2024-08-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.08.02.24311426 medRxiv
Show abstract

The precise microbial determinants driving clinical outcomes in severe pneumonia are unknown. Competing ecological forces produce dynamic microbiota states in health; infection and treatment effects on microbiota state must be defined to improve pneumonia therapy. Here, we leverage our unique clinical setting, which includes systematic and serial bronchoscopic sampling in patients with suspected pneumonia, to determine lung microbial ecosystem dynamics throughout pneumonia therapy. We combine 16S rRNA gene amplicon, metagenomic, and transcriptomic sequencing with bacterial load quantification to reveal clinically-relevant pneumonia progression drivers. Microbiota states are predictive of pneumonia category and exhibit differential stability and pneumonia therapy response. Disruptive forces, like aspiration, associate with cohesive changes in gene expression and microbial community structure. In summary, we show that host and microbiota landscapes change in unison with clinical phenotypes and that microbiota state dynamics reflect pneumonia progression. We suggest that distinct pathways of lung microbial community succession mediate pneumonia progression. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=175 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24311426v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (72K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e92a0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12c7499org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19aef90org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e60900_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical Abstract 1.C_FLOATNO Determining landscape dynamics of lung microbial ecosystems with multiomics. C_FIG

Published in Cell Host & Microbe · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.