Alzheimer's Disease Classification Confidence of Individuals using Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data
Alausa, A. S.; Sanchez-Bornot, J. M.; Asadpour, A.; McClean, P. L.; Wong-Lin, K.
Show abstract
Making accurate diagnosis of Alzheimers disease (AD) is crucial for effective treatment and management. Although deep learning has been applied to AD classification, it is typically performed at group level, the data used are not sufficiently heterogeneous and comprehensive, and decision confidence is not evaluated at individual (single patient) level. This paper proposed a more practical deep learning approach that not only detects AD stages of individuals, but also provides its corresponding confidence estimation. In particular, in addition to a convolutional neural network (CNN), we incorporated a softmax confidence metric based on the networks output activity to evaluate its classification confidence. Further, we applied this approach to a heterogeneous and comprehensive data that comprised cognitive and functional assessments, tau-PET and MRI neuroimaging, medical/family history, demographic, and APoE genotype. Importantly, we utilised leave-one-out cross-validation to train the CNN and classify an individuals healthy control, mild cognitive impairment or AD state, while concurrently estimating each output decisions confidence. We showed that, over different confidence softmax temperature values, CNN could attain classification accuracies at 83-85% for the three classes while having robust confidence scores of 78-83%. Further improvement in confidence breakdown was achieved using the optimal temperature value in confidence evaluation, with higher confidence scores for correct than error decisions. Overall, the computed classification confidence of an individual may aid clinicians and other stakeholders in understanding the reliability of the models decision outcome and offer better trust. The implication of this work may extend to other classification applications, in which the confidence level of a single deep learning-based decision can be evaluated.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An AI-assisted Online Tool for Cognitive Impairment Detection Using Images from the Clock Drawing Test 98%
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 97%
- Topographical overlapping of the Aβ and Tau pathologies in the Default mode networks predicts Alzheimer’s Disease with higher specificity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Random forest model for feature-based Alzheimer's disease conversion prediction from early mild cognitive impairment subjects 98%
- c-Triadem: A constrained, explainable deep learning model to identify novel biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- Interpretable multivariate survival models: Improving predictions for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimers disease (AD) via data fusion and machine learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Alzheimer Disease Knowledge Graph Enhances Knowledge Discovery and Disease Prediction 93%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 92%
- BenchXAI: Comprehensive Benchmarking of Post-hoc Explainable AI Methods on Multi-Modal Biomedical Data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.