Normative Growth Modeling of Cortical Thickness Identify Neuroanatomical Variability and Distinct Subtypes in Brainstem Tumor Patients
Jia, H.; Wang, K.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, M.; Mai, Y.; Chu, C.; Yin, X.; Fan, L.; Zhang, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundBrainstem tumors can cause structural brain changes, but the resulting heterogeneity within wholebrain structure is not well-studied. This study examines cortical thickness to identify patterns of structural alterations and explore underlying biological subtypes and their associations with clinical factors. Materials and MethodsThis study involved 124 pediatric brainstem tumor patients, aged 4-18 years. Cortical thickness was measured using CAT12 segmentation of 3D T1-weighted structural MRI. A normative model was established using data from 849 healthy children. Deviations in cortical thickness were estimated, and patients were classified into two subtypes using spectral clustering. Clinical statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 26.0. ResultsThe normative model revealed significant heterogeneity in cortical thickness deviations, which correlated with tumor size and growth patterns. Focal tumors primarily caused negative deviations (t = 3.14, p = 0.02). There was a significant positive correlation between extreme positive deviations and tumor volume (r = 0.214, p = 0.010), and between extreme negative deviations and progression-free survival (r = 0.39, p = 0.008). Two subtypes were identified: Subtype 1, consisting of diffuse tumors with extreme positive deviations, and Subtype 2, consisting of focal tumors with extreme negative deviations. Subtype and tumor growth pattern significantly influenced duration (p < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for Subtype 1 and Subtype 2 demonstrated a significant difference in survival probabilities over time (p = 0.03). ConclusionOverall, this study identifies two major patterns of cortical thickness changes in brainstem tumor patients, enhancing our understanding of their relationship with cortical morphology. The findings suggest that cortical thickness alterations could serve as valuable biomarkers for predicting progression-free survival, which is crucial for clinical assessment and personalized treatment strategies. This research provides new insights into the physiological mechanisms by which brainstem tumors affect brain structure, supporting more precise clinical interventions and efficacy monitoring in the future.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of IDH Mutation Status In Brain Gliomas 93%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Characterisation of Radionecrotic Changes in Glioblastoma Patients 92%
- A non-local diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tract density biomarker to stratify, predict, and interpret survival rates in human glioblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence of supratentorial white matter injury prior to treatment in children with posterior fossa tumours using diffusion MRI 95%
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 95%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Patients with Cognitive Motor Dissociation Using Resting-state Temporal Stability 92%
- Multimodal anatomical mapping of subcortical regions in Marmoset monkeys using high-resolution MRI and matched histology with multiple stains. 92%
- Linking Brain Entropy to Molecular and Cellular Architecture in Psychosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of meningioma and glioma on whole-brain dynamics 93%
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 93%
- Predicting Prognosis and IDH Mutation Status for Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas Using Whole Slide Images 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.