Model selection for spectral parameterization
Wilson, L. E.; da Silva Castanheira, J.; Kinder, B. L.; Baillet, S.
Show abstract
Neurophysiological brain activity comprises rhythmic (periodic) and arrhythmic (aperiodic) signal elements, which are increasingly studied in relation to behavioral traits and clinical symptoms. Current methods for spectral parameterization of neural recordings rely on user-dependent parameter selection, which includes selecting the correct maximum number of spectral peaks to fit to the spectrum. This challenges the replicability and robustness of findings. Here, we introduce a data-driven model-selection procedure for determining the appropriate number of oscillatory peaks to fit to neural power spectra, based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). We present extensive tests of the approach with ground-truth and empirical magnetoencephalography recordings. Data-driven model selection enhances both the specificity and sensitivity of spectral decompositions. Overall, the proposed spectral decomposition with data-driven model selection reduces reliance on user-defined maximum number of peaks settings, enabling more robust, reproducible, and interpretable spectral parameterizations. Lay summaryBrain activity is composed of rhythmic patterns that repeat over time and arrhythmic elements that are less structured. Recent advances in brain signal analysis have improved our ability to distinguish between these two types of components, enhancing our understanding of brain signals. However, current methods require users to adjust several parameters manually to obtain their results. The outcomes of the analyses, therefore, depend on each users decisions and expertise. To improve the replicability of research findings, the authors propose a revised method to streamline the analysis of brain signal contents. They developed a new algorithm that defines the parameters of the analytical pipeline informed by the data. The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated with both synthesized and real-world data. The approach is made available to all researchers as a free, open-source app, observing best practices for neuroscience research.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Different methods to estimate the phase of neural rhythms agree, but only during times of low uncertainty 95%
- Electrophysiological Frequency Band Ratio Measures Conflate Periodic and Aperiodic Neural Activity 94%
- Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard multiscale entropy reflects neural dynamics at mismatched temporal scales: What's signal irregularity got to do with it? 96%
- Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modeling 95%
- Time-resolved dynamic computational modeling of human EEG recordings reveals gradients of generative mechanisms for the MMN response 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.