Back

Mapping Kappa Opioid Receptor Binding in Titi Monkeys with 11C-GR103545 PET

Almeida, A. J. D.; Hobson, B. A.; Savidge, L. E.; Manca, C.; Paulus, J. P.; Bales, K. L.; Chaudhari, A. J.

2024-08-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.01.606042 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe kappa opioid receptor (KOR) plays a pivotal role in stress- and anxiety-related behaviors, especially in social separation and bonding. However, KOR modulations in these social contexts are not fully characterized. The coppery titi monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus) has been utilized as a translational animal model for studying the neurobiology of attachment, as they form socially monogamous adult pair bonds. While the PET radiotracer 11C-GR103545 has shown the ability to track KOR activity in other species, it has not been utilized in titi monkeys. This study assessed 11C-GR103545 PET for characterizing KOR activity in vivo and its pharmacological blockade in titi monkeys. MethodsAdult titi monkeys (N=6) underwent 11C-GR103545 PET brain scans at baseline, followed by repeat scans upon administration of a KOR antagonist (CERC-501) and a KOR agonist (U50,488). Region-specific, non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) was calculated, with the cerebellum as the reference region, focusing on 14 brain volumes of interest (VOIs) implicated in social bonding. ResultsBaseline 11C-GR103545 uptake characteristics across VOIs were consistent with previous reports in humans and other monkey models. CERC-501 pretreatment led to a significant reduction in BPND (average 55.99%) across several, but not all brain VOIs, with the most notable reduction in the superior frontal gyrus (76.25%). In contrast, U50,488 pretreatment resulted in no significant BPND changes across the VOIs analyzed. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the utility of 11C-GR103545 to assess KOR binding dynamics in a monkey model of social bonding. Region-specific blockade of KOR was observed after pretreatment by CERC-501, while blockade by the KOR agonist U50,488 did not change 11C-GR103545 binding.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.