Back

Investigating the Role of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Germline Genetics on Prostate Cancer Risk

Judd, J.; Spence, J. P.; Pritchard, J. K.; Kachuri, L.; Witte, J. S.

2024-08-02 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.07.31.24311312 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGenetic factors play an important role in prostate cancer (PCa) development with polygenic risk scores (PRS) predicting disease risk across genetic ancestries. However, there are few convincing modifiable factors for PCa and little is known about their potential interaction with genetic risk. We analyzed incident PCa cases (n=6,155) and controls (n=98,257) of European and African ancestry from the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort to evaluate the role of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES)-and how it may interact with PRS-on PCa risk. MethodsWe evaluated a multi-ancestry PCa PRS containing 269 genetic variants to understand the association of germline genetics with PCa in UKB. Using the English Indices of Deprivation, a set of validated metrics that quantify lack of resources within geographical areas, we performed logistic regression to investigate the main effects and interactions between nSES deprivation, PCa PRS, and PCa. ResultsThe PCa PRS was strongly associated with PCa (OR=2.04; 95%CI=2.00-2.09; P<0.001). Additionally, nSES deprivation indices were inversely associated with PCa: employment (OR=0.91; 95%CI=0.86-0.96; P<0.001), education (OR=0.94; 95%CI=0.83-0.98; P<0.001), health (OR=0.91; 95%CI=0.86-0.96; P<0.001), and income (OR=0.91; 95%CI=0.86-0.96; P<0.001). The PRS effects showed little heterogeneity across nSES deprivation indices, except for the Townsend Index (P=0.03). ConclusionsWe reaffirmed genetics as a risk factor for PCa and identified nSES deprivation domains that influence PCa detection and are potentially correlated with environmental exposures that are a risk factor for PCa. These findings also suggest that nSES and genetic risk factors for PCa act independently.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%