Prescribing Practices And Clinical Impact Of Next Generation Sequencing In Routine Practice In Solid Tumors - Real World Experience In Lmic
zehra, n.; Zehra, N. E.; Sohail, A.; Ansar, Z.; Moosajee, M.
Show abstract
Molecular characterization of disease is essential for precision medicine due to novel predictive biomarkers. Multiple next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are available, but their expense and clinical utility vary. Even if a targetable mutation is detected, corresponding drugs may not be available or affordable. No prior studies in Pakistan have focused on integrating NGS results into patient care to assist with therapeutic decision-making and survival outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the molecular profiling and therapeutic implications of NGS testing across solid tumors. It included all patients with histologically proven malignancy (metastatic or non-metastatic) who had NGS analysis at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) from June 1, 2020, to June 1, 2023. Foundation One was the NGS platform used. From 2020 to 2023, 192 patients underwent NGS. The majority were male (55.2%) and aged over 50 years (71.9%). The most common indications for NGS were carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) and lung cancers, representing 26% and 25% respectively, followed by colon (9%) and breast cancers (8%). Most patients had metastatic disease (98.4%). Common mutations in lung cancer were EGFR (16.3%) and KRAS G12C (14.3%). In unknown primary, breast, and colon cancers, the most common mutations were BRAF (8%), PIK3CA (18%), and KRAS (42.1%), respectively. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was performed in 95% of patients, with 6% being MSI high. Actionable alterations were detected in 31.8% of patients, but only 17.2% received genotype-matched treatment, mostly as a first-line treatment for lung cancer. The primary barriers were drug availability and affordability. Our results show that the implementation of NGS analysis supports clinical decision making. However, these results were applicable to a small percentage of patients. For better compliance and applicability, drug availability and cost of treatment needs to be addressed
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep sequencing of early T stage colorectal cancers reveals disruption of homologous recombination repair in microsatellite stable tumours with high mutational burdens 93%
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 93%
- Genomic profile in TGCT Mexican patients reveals a potential biomarker of sensitivity to platinum-based therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 94%
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 93%
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Correlation between CD44, Radiotherapy Response and Survival Rate in Patients with Advanced Stage of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) 94%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 93%
- Detecting PI3K and TP53 Pathway Disruptions in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanic/Latino Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 94%
- Projected Cancer Burden, Challenges, and Barriers to Cancer Prevention and Control Activities in the State of Telangana 94%
- Prevalence and spectrum of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in multiethnic cohort of breast cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.