Back

Harnessing CRISPR interference to re-sensitize laboratory strains and clinical isolates to last resort antibiotics

Frusteri Chiacchiera, A.; Casanova, M.; Bellato, M.; Piazza, A.; Migliavacca, R.; Batt, G.; Magni, P.; Pasotti, L.

2024-07-30 synthetic biology
10.1101/2024.07.30.604783 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The global race against antimicrobial resistance requires novel antimicrobials that are not only effective in killing specific bacteria, but also minimize the emergence of new resistances. Recently, CRISPR/Cas-based antimicrobials were proposed to address killing specificity with encouraging results. However, the emergence of target sequence mutations triggered by Cas-cleavage was identified as an escape strategy, posing the risk of generating new antibiotic-resistance gene (ARG) variants. Here, we evaluated an antibiotic re-sensitization strategy based on CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), which inhibits gene expression without damaging target DNA. The resistance to four antibiotics, including last resort drugs, was significantly reduced by individual and multi-gene targeting of ARGs in low- to high-copy numbers in recombinant E. coli. Escaper analysis confirmed the absence of mutations in target sequence, corroborating the harmless role of CRISPRi in the selection of new resistances. E. coli clinical isolates carrying ARGs of severe clinical concern were then used to test the robustness of CRISPRi under different growth conditions. Meropenem, colistin and cefotaxime susceptibility was successfully increased in terms of MIC (up to >4-fold) and growth delay (up to 11-hours) in a medium-dependent fashion. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of CRISPRi-mediated re-sensitization to last-resort drugs in clinical isolates. This study laid the foundations for further leveraging CRISPRi as antimicrobial agent or research tool to selectively repress ARGs and investigate resistance mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.