Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they won't side with the plaintiff: Examining perceptions of liability about AI in radiology
Bernstein, M. H.; Sheppard, B.; Bruno, M. A.; Lay, P. S.; Baird, G. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) will have unintended consequences for radiology. When a radiologist misses an abnormality on an image, their liability may differ according to whether or not AI also missed the abnormality. MethodsU.S. adults viewed a vignette describing a radiologist being sued for missing a brain bleed (N=652) or cancer (N=682). Participants were randomized to one of five conditions. In four conditions, they were told an AI system was used. Either AI agreed with the radiologist, also failing to find pathology (AI agree) or did find pathology (AI disagree). In the AI agree+FOR condition, AI agreed with the radiologist and an AI false omission rate (FOR) of 1% was presented. In the AI disagree+FDR condition, AI disagreed and an AI false discovery rate (FDR) of 50% was presented. There was also a no AI control condition. Otherwise, vignettes were identical. Participants indicated whether the radiologist met their duty of care as a proxy for whether they would side with defense (radiologist) or plaintiff in trial. ResultsParticipants were more likely to side with the plaintiff in the AI disagree vs. AI agree condition (brain bleed: 72.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.0054; cancer: 78.7% vs. 63.5%, p=0.00365) and in the AI disagree vs. no AI condition (brain bleed: 72.9% vs. 56.3%, p=0.0054; cancer: 78.7% vs. 65.2%, p=0.00895). Participants were less likely to side with the plaintiff when FDR or FOR were provided: AI disagree vs AI disagree+FDR (brain bleed: 72.9% vs. 48.8%, p=0.00005; cancer: 78.7% vs. 73.1%, p=0.1507), and AI agree vs. AI agree+FOR (brain bleed: 50.0% vs. 34.0%, p=0.0044; cancer: 63.5% vs. 56.4%, p=0.1085). DiscussionRadiologists who failed to find an abnormality are viewed as more culpable when they used an AI system that detected the abnormality. Presenting participants with AI accuracy data decreased perceived liability. These findings have relevance for courtroom proceedings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for detection of pneumothorax and tension pneumothorax on chest radiograph 91%
- Characterizing Potential Conflicts of Interest Among UpToDate and DynaMed Content Contributors 89%
- Crowdfunding Medical Care: A Comparison of Online Medical Fundraising in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- tbiExtractor: A framework for Extracting Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements from Radiology Reports 90%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 89%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Communicating personalised risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study 90%
- Discrepancy review: A feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications 89%
- Getting stuck in a rut as an emergent feature of a dynamic decision-making system 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- “This is a quiz” Premise Input: A Key to Unlocking Higher Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models 90%
- Evaluating Text-to-Image Generated Photorealistic Images of Human Anatomy 89%
- Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 92%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 90%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.