Lesion location changes the association between brain excitability and motor skill acquisition post-stroke
de las Heras, B.; Rodrigues, L.; Cristini, J.; Moncion, K.; Dancause, N.; Thiel, A.; Edwards, J.; Eng, J. J.; Tang, A.; Roig, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe capacity to reacquire motor skills lost after a stroke is crucial to promote upper-limb motor recovery but the impact of lesion location on motor skill acquisition and the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain uncertain. MethodsWe used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate associations between excitatory and inhibitory cortico-spinal excitability measures and the capacity to acquire a novel motor skill with the most affected hand in 103 individuals with cortical (n=34) or subcortical (n=69) lesions. ResultsBoth groups showed similar motor skill acquisition, but subcortical lesions exhibited more impairment in the most affected hand and lower excitability in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In cortical lesions, motor skill acquisition was associated with lower motor thresholds ({beta}=-0.25, 95% CI [-0.47,-0.03]; p=0.024) and higher intracortical inhibition ({beta}=-3.93, 95% CI [-6.89,-0.98]; p=0.011) in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In contrast, in subcortical lesions motor skill acquisition was associated with smaller motor evoked potentials ({beta}=-4.46, 95% CI [-8.54,-0.38]; p=0.033), less intracortical inhibition ({beta}=3.45, 95% CI [0.34,6.56]; p=0.030) and higher facilitation ({beta}=1.34,95% CI [0.15,2.54]; p= 0.028) ipsilesionally. Sensitivity analyses revealed that associations with intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the subcortical group were driven by lesions affecting the corticospinal tract. No associations were found in the contralesional hemisphere. ConclusionsReinforcing the existence of lesion-specific neurophysiological patterns, individuals with cortical and subcortical lesions show divergent associations between cortico-spinal excitability and motor skill acquisition. The use of cortico-spinal excitability as a biomarker to predict upper-limb recovery post-stroke or guide motor recovery interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation should consider lesion location.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 96%
- Stroke recovery related changes in brain reactivity based on modulation of intracortical inhibition 94%
- Altered functional connectivity between cortical premotor areas and the spinal cord in chronic stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain State-dependent Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Stroke Rehabilitation: A Proof of Concept Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 94%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utilising TMS-EEG to assess the response to cerebellar-brain inhibition 89%
- The polarity specific nature of single session high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex on motor and non-motor task performance 89%
- Cerebellar degeneration impairs strategy discovery but not strategy recall 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter hyperintensities modify relationships between corticospinal tract damage and motor outcomes after stroke 92%
- Lesions in putative language and attention regions are linked to more severe strokes in patients with higher white matter hyperintensity burden 92%
- Regional distribution of anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest: clinical and electrographic correlates 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.