Back

3D Regional Evaluation of Right Ventricular Myocardial Work from cineCT

Craine, A.; Scott, A.; Desai, D.; Kligerman, S.; Adler, E. D.; Kim, N.; Alshawabkeh, L.; Contijoch, F. J.

2024-08-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.07.30.24311094 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRegional myocardial work (MW) is not measured in the right ventricle (RV) due to a lack of high spatial resolution regional strain (RS) estimates throughout the ventricle. We present a cineCT-based approach to evaluate regional RV performance and demonstrate its ability to phenotype three complex populations: end-stage LV failure (HF), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). Methods49 patients (19 HF, 11 CTEPH, 19 rTOF) underwent cineCT and right heart catheterization (RHC). RS was estimated from full-cycle ECG-gated cineCT and combined with RHC pressure waveforms to create regional pressure-strain loops; endocardial MW was measured as the loop area. Detailed, 3D mapping of RS and MW enabled spatial visualization of strain and work strength, and phenotyping of patients. ResultsHF patients demonstrated more overall impaired strain and work compared to the CTEPH and rTOF cohorts. For example, the HF patients had more akinetic areas (median: 9%) than CTEPH (median: <1%, p=0.02) and rTOF (median: 1%, p<0.01) and performed more low work (median: 69%) than the rTOF cohort (median: 38%, p<0.01). The CTEPH cohort had more impairment in the septal wall; <1% of the free wall and 16% of the septal wall performed negative work. The rTOF cohort demonstrated a wide distribution of strain and work, ranging from hypokinetic to hyperkinetic strain and low to medium-high work. Impaired strain (-0.15[&le;]RS) and negative work were strongly-to-very strongly correlated with RVEF (R=-0.89, p<0.01; R=-0.70, p<0.01 respectively), while impaired work (MW[&le;]5 mmHg) was moderately correlated with RVEF (R=-0.53, p<0.01). ConclusionsRegional RV MW maps can be derived from clinical CT and RHC studies and can provide patient-specific phenotyping of RV function in complex heart disease patients. Clinical PerspectiveEvaluating regional variations in right ventricular (RV) performance can be challenging, particularly in patients with significant impairments due to the need for 3D spatial coverage with high spatial resolution. ECG-gated cineCT can fully visualize the RV and be used to quantify regional strain with high spatial resolution. However, strain is influenced by loading conditions. Myocardial work (MW) - measured clinically derived as the ventricular pressure-strain loop area - is considered a more comprehensive metric due to its independence of preload and afterload. In this study, we sought to develop regional RV myocardial work (MW) assessments in 3D with high spatial resolution by combining cineCT-derived regional strain with RV pressure waveforms from right heart catheterization (RHC). We developed our method using data from three clinical cohorts who routinely undergo cineCT and RHC: patients in heart failure, patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. We demonstrate that regional strain and work provide different perspectives on RV performance. While strain can be used to evaluate apparent function, similar profiles of RV strain can lead to different MW estimates. Specifically, MW integrates apparent strain with measures of afterload, and timing information helps to account for dyssynchrony. As a result, CT-based assessment of RV MW appears to be a useful new metric for the care of patients with dysfunction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.5%
2
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
19
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%