Automated Pediatric Brain Tumor Imaging Assessment Tool from CBTN: Enhancing Suprasellar Region Inclusion and Managing Limited Data with Deep Learning
Gandhi, D. B.; Khalili, N.; Familiar, A.; Gottipati, A.; Khalili, N.; Tu, W.; Haldar, S.; Anderson, H.; Viswanathan, K.; Storm, P. B.; Ware, J. B.; Resnick, A. C.; Vossough, A.; Nabavizadeh, A.; Fathi Kazerooni, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundFully-automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation. MethodsMulti-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n=336 for skull-stripping, n=489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired two-sample t-tests and Pearsons correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies. ResultsDice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98{+/-}0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearsons correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; p<0.05 for all). WT Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84{+/-}0.17 (median=0.90) for T2 and 0.82{+/-}0.19 (median=0.89) for FLAIR inputs. ET Dice scores were 0.65{+/-}0.35 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64{+/-}0.36 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs. ConclusionOur skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and enhancing tumor regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context. Brief key pointsO_LIDeep learning models for skull-stripping, including the sellar/suprasellar regions, demonstrate robustness across various pediatric brain tumor histologies. C_LIO_LIThe automated brain tumor segmentation models perform reliably even in limited data scenarios. C_LI Importance of the StudyWe present robust skull-stripping models that work with single- and multi-parametric MR images and include the sellar-suprasellar regions in the extracted brain tissue. Since [~]10% of the pediatric brain tumors originate in the sellar/suprasellar region, including the deep-seated regions within the extracted brain tissue makes these models generalizable for a wider range of tumor histologies. We also present two tumor segmentation models, one for segmenting whole tumor using T2/FLAIR images, and another for segmenting enhancing tumor region using T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR images. These models demonstrate excellent performance with limited input. Both the skull-stripping and tumor segmentation models work with one- or two-input MRI sequences, making them useful in cases where multi-parametric images are not available - especially in real-world clinical scenarios. These models help to address the issue of missing data, making it possible to include subjects for longitudinal assessment and monitoring treatment response, which would have otherwise been excluded.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 99%
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR-images with age fusion 98%
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of 1p/19q Co-Deletion Status In Brain Gliomas 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 98%
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 95%
- An AI-based segmentation and analysis pipeline for high-field MR monitoring of cerebral organoids 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between pathological brain activity and functional network connectivity in glioma patients 91%
- Early Imaging Marker of Progressive Glioblastoma: a window of opportunity 91%
- Predicting attention deficits and functional recovery after glioma resection through functional executive networks: insights from dynamic properties 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual super-resolution in multiple sclerosis MRI 94%
- Feasibility of FreeSurfer processing for T1-weighted brain images of 5-year-olds: semiautomated protocol of FinnBrain Neuroimaging Lab 94%
- Verifying the concordance between motion corrected and conventional MPRAGE for pediatric morphometric analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subcortical Segmentation of the Fetal Brain in 3D Ultrasound using Deep Learning 94%
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 94%
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.