Back

Degradability tunes ECM stress relaxation and cellular mechanics

Narasimhan, B. N.; Fraley, S. I.

2024-07-29 biophysics
10.1101/2024.07.28.605514 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In native extracellular matrices (ECM), cells can use matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) to degrade and remodel their surroundings. Likewise, synthetic matrices have been engineered to facilitate MMP-mediated cleavage that enables cell spreading, migration, and interactions. However, the intersection of matrix degradability and mechanical properties has not been fully considered. We hypothesized that immediate mechanical changes result from the action of MMPs on the ECM and that these changes are sensed by cells. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure cell-scale mechanical properties, we find that both fibrillar collagen and synthetic degradable matrices exhibit enhanced stress relaxation after MMP exposure. Cells respond to these relaxation differences by altering their spreading and focal adhesions. We demonstrate that stress relaxation can be tuned through the rational design of matrix degradability. These findings establish a fundamental link between matrix degradability and stress relaxation, which may impact a range of biological applications. Table of contentsThis work reveals that matrix degradability, through its effects on stress relaxation, is an important cellular mechanotransduction cue. Cell-scale mechanical characterization shows that collagen gels and degradable synthetic gels display enhanced stress relaxation post-degradation. Stress relaxation is then tuned by systematically varying degradability, resulting in the regulation of cell spreading. This identifies degradability as a key chemomechanical design feature. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=181 SRC="FIGDIR/small/605514v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13a701dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@196bb05org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d04613org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a8b1d1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
12
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
15
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
21
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Cell Reports Physical Science
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%