CDK4/6 and SHP2 mediate BRAF/MEK inhibitor resistance in Class 2 and 3 BRAF mutant cancers
Rose, A. A. N.; Maxwell, J. L.; Rousselle, E.; Riaud, M.; Elkholi, I. E.; Mukonoweshuro, C.; Biondini, M.; Cianfarano, E.; Soria-Bretones, I.; Tobin, C.; McGuire, M.; King, I.; Zhang, T.; Pugh, T.; Saeed Kamil, Z.; Shepherd, F. A.; Leighl, N.; Abdul Razak, A.; Hansen, A.; Saibil, S.; Bedard, P.; Siegel, P. M.; Siu, L. L.; Cescon, D. W.; Spreafico, A.
Show abstract
Class 2 and 3 non-V600E BRAF mutations are oncogenic drivers in many cancer types. Currently, there are no established targeted therapies with proven efficacy for cancers with non-V600E BRAF mutations. We developed the investigator-initiated, Phase II BEAVER clinical trial (NCT03839342) to evaluate the efficacy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with non-V600E BRAF mutations. The best objective response rate was 14% (3/21). By analyzing genomic data from patient tumors, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models generated from enrolled patients, and functional genomics of Class 2 & 3 BRAF mutant cell lines, we discovered MAPK-dependent and independent mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition. These included the acquisition of new mutations in NRAS, MAP2K1, RAF1, and RB in ctDNA at the time of disease progression. We observed an enrichment for alterations in genes that regulate cell cycle progression amongst non-responders and increased expression of genes mediating cell cycle progression in tumors Class 2 BRAF mutant cell lines with acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. In Class 3 BRAF mutant cancers specifically, PTPN11 (SHP2) was an essential gene. CDK4/6 and SHP2 were found to mediate intrinsic resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition in Class 2 & 3 BRAF mutant tumors. Therapeutic strategies combining CDK4/6 or SHP2 inhibitors with BRAF/MEK inhibitors were more effective than BRAF/MEK inhibitors alone in vitro and in vivo, highlighting the need to explore therapeutic targets outside of the MAPK pathway in these hard-to-treat Class 2 & 3 BRAF mutant cancers.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PI3K/mTOR is a therapeutically targetable genetic dependency in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma 96%
- Targeted therapies prime oncogene-driven lung cancers for macrophage-mediated destruction 95%
- Targeting EIF4A triggers an interferon response to synergize with chemotherapy and suppress triple-negative breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination Therapies Targeting Alk-Aberrant Neuroblastoma In Preclinical Models. 96%
- RRAS and RRAS2 mutations are recurrent oncogenic drivers in lung cancer and are sensitive to the pan-RAS inhibitor RMC-6236 95%
- Suppression of tumor cell lactate-generating signaling pathways eradicates murine PTEN/p53-deficient aggressive-variant prostate cancer via macrophage phagocytosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A targetable PREX2/RAC1/PI3Kβ signalling axis confers resistance to clinically relevant therapeutic approaches in melanoma 96%
- Biomarker-guided treatment strategies for ovarian cancer identified from a heterogeneous panel of patient-derived tumor xenografts 96%
- Systematic analysis uncovers SYK dependency in NF1LoF melanoma cells 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bcl-xL is a key mediator of apoptosis following KRASG12C inhibition in KRASG12C mutant colorectal cancer. 96%
- Exploitation of sulfated glycosaminoglycan status for precision medicine of platinums in triple-negative breast cancer 96%
- Ovarian cancers with low CIP2A tumor expression constitute an APR-246 sensitive disease subtype 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term breast cancer response to CDK4/6 inhibition defined by TP53-mediated geroconversion 96%
- Clinical and molecular features of acquired resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer 95%
- Thyroid Hormone Suppresses Medulloblastoma Progression Through Promoting Terminal Differentiation of Tumor Cells 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.