Back

What NLR you recognizing? Predicted binding affinities- and energies may be used to identify novel NLR-effector interactions

Fick, A.; Fick, J. L. M.; Swart, V.; van den Berg, N.

2024-07-27 plant biology
10.1101/2024.07.26.605369 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nucleotide binding Leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins play a crucial role in effector recognition and activation of Effector triggered immunity in plants following pathogen infection. Advances in genome sequencing have led to the identification of a myriad NLRs in numerous agriculturally important plant species. However, deciphering which NLR proteins recognize specific pathogen effectors remains a challenge. Predicting NLR-effector interactions in silico would provide a more targeted approach for experimental validation, critical for elucidating function, and advancing our understanding of NLR-triggered immunity. In this study, NLR-effector protein complex structures were predicted using AlphaFold2-Multimer for all experimentally validated NLR-effector interactions. Binding affinities- and energies were predicted using 97 machine learning models from Area-affinity. We show that predicted structures with an AlphaFold confidence score > 0.42 have acceptable accuracy, and can be used to investigate NLR-effector interactions in silico. Binding affinities for 58 NLR-effector complexes ranged between -8.5 and -10.6 log(K), and binding energies between -11.8 and -14.4 kcal/mol, depending on the Area-Affinity model used. For 2427 "forced" NLR-effector complexes, these estimates showed larger variability, enabling the identification of novel NLR-effector complexes with 99% accuracy using an Ensemble machine learning model. The narrow range of binding energies- and affinities for true interactions suggest a specific change in Gibbs free energy, and thus conformational change, is required for NLR activation. This is the first study to provide a method for predicting NLR-effector interactions, applicable to all plant-pathogen interactions. Finally, the NLR-Effector Interaction Classification (NEIC) resource can streamline research efforts by identifying NLRs important for providing resistance against plant pathogens, advancing our understanding of plant immunity.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.6%
2
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
6
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
13
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
15
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
16
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
17
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
22
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
28
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
29
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%