Environmental context sculpts spatial and temporal visual processing in thalamus
Haider, B.; Peelman, K.
Show abstract
Behavioral state modulates neural activity throughout the visual system1-3. This is largely due to changes in arousal that alter internal brain state4-10. Much is known about how these internal factors influence visual processing7-11, but comparatively less is known about the role of external environmental contexts12. Environmental contexts can promote or prevent certain actions13, and it remains unclear if and how this affects visual processing. Here, we addressed this question in the thalamus of awake head-fixed mice while they viewed stimuli but remained stationary in two different environmental contexts: either a cylindrical tube, or a circular running wheel that enabled locomotion. We made silicon probe recordings in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) while simultaneously measuring multiple metrics of arousal changes, so that we could control for them across contexts. We found surprising differences in spatial and temporal processing in dLGN across contexts. The wheel context (versus tube) showed elevated baseline activity, and faster but less spatially selective visual responses; however, these visual processing differences disappeared if the wheel no longer enabled locomotion. Our results reveal an unexpected influence of the physical environmental context on fundamental aspects of early visual processing, even in otherwise identical states of alertness and stillness.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal mismatch responses in associative but not primary visual cortex evidence hierarchical predictive coding in cortical networks 97%
- Long-range cortical synchronization supports abrupt visual learning 97%
- Binocular processing facilitates escape behavior through multiple pathways to the superior colliculus 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.