Back

Environmental "Wiggles" as Stabilizers of Species Range Limits Set by Interspecific Competition

Shirani, F.; Freeman, B. G.

2024-07-25 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.24.605034 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whether interspecific competition is a major contributing factor to setting species range limits has been debated for a long time. Theoretical studies using evolutionary models have proposed that the interaction between interspecific competition and disruptive gene flow along an environmental gradient can halt range expansion of ecologically related species where they meet. However, the stability of such range limits has not been well addressed. We use a deterministic PDE model of adaptive range evolution over a continuous habitat to show that the range limits set by interspecific competition between two closely related species are unlikely to be evolutionarily stable if the environmental optima for fitness-related traits vary linearly in space. That is, in a (almost) linear environment without a dispersal barrier or a third (or more) related species, the range limits formed at the interface of two competing species constantly move towards the weaker species. Through extensive numerical computations, we then demonstrate that environmental nonlinearities such as "knees" and "wiggles"--wherein an isolated sharp change or a step-like change occurs in the steepness of a trait optimum--can strongly stabilize competitively formed range limits. The stabilization mechanism relies on the contrast that such nonlinearities create in the level of disruptive gene flow to the peripheral population of each species. We show that the stability of the range limits established at these nonlinearities, which are likely prevalent in nature, is robust against moderate environmental disturbances. Whether or not strong disturbances such as rapid high-amplitude changes in climate can destabilize such range limits depends on how the competitive dominance of the competing species changes across the environmental nonlinearity. Therefore, our results identify habitat regions where species ranges are fairly insensitive to climate change, and highlight the importance of measuring the competitive ability of species when predicting their response to climate change.

Published in PLOS Computational Biology (predicted rank #13) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
PLOS Computational Biology · published here
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.6%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
18
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
20
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%