Back

In vivo quantification of anterior and posterior chamber volumes in mice: implications for aqueous humor dynamics

Kim, D.; Fang, R.; Zhang, P.; Sun, C.; Li, G.; Montgomery, C.; John, S. W. M.; Stamer, W. D.; Zhang, H. F.; Ethier, C. R.

2024-07-25 physiology
10.1101/2024.07.24.604989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAqueous humor inflow rate, a key parameter influencing aqueous humor dynamics, is typically measured by fluorophotometery. Analyzing fluorophotometric data depends, inter alia, on the volume of aqueous humor in the anterior, but not the posterior, chamber. Previous fluorophotometric studies of aqueous inflow rate in mice have assumed the ratio of anterior:posterior volumes in mice to be similar to those in humans. Our goal was to measure anterior and posterior chamber volumes in mice to facilitate better estimates of aqueous inflow rates. MethodsWe used standard near-infrared optical coherence tomography (OCT) and robotic visible-light OCT (vis-OCT) to visualize, reconstruct and quantify the volumes of the anterior and posterior chambers of the mouse eye in vivo. We used histology and micro-CT scans to validate relevant landmarks from ex vivo tissues to facilitate in vivo measurement. ResultsPosterior chamber volume is 1.1 times the anterior chamber volume in BALB/cAnNCrl mice, i.e. the anterior chamber constitutes about 47% of the total aqueous humor volume, which is very dissimilar to the situation in humans. Anterior chamber volumes in 2-month-old BALB/cAnNCrl and 7-month-old C57BL6/J mice were 1.55 {+/-} 0.36 {micro}L (n=10) and 2.41 {+/-} 0.29 {micro}L (n=8), respectively. This implies that previous studies likely over-estimated aqueous inflow rate by approximately two-fold. ConclusionsIt is necessary to reassess previously reported estimates of aqueous inflow rates, and thus aqueous humor dynamics in the mouse. For example, we now estimate that only 0-15% of aqueous humor drains via the pressure-independent (unconventional) route, similar to that seen in humans and monkeys.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.