Back

Population responses to environmental stochasticity are primarily driven by survival-reproduction trade-offs and mediated by aridity

Santos, G. S.; Yang, X.; Gascoigne, S.; Compagnoni, A.; Dias, A.; Tuljapurkar, S. D.; Kajin, M.; Salguero-Gomez, R.

2024-07-24 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.24.604949 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Forecasting responses of natural populations to increasingly stochastic environments is a major challenge in Ecology and Conservation Biology. We now know that populations can modulate how their vital rates (e.g., survival, reproduction) change through time to minimise the negative impacts of environmental stochasticity. However, despite the important analytical and theoretical advances that have led to this knowledge, we still do not know (1) how much this ability of natural populations to buffer against environmental stochasticity can vary in nature, nor (2) the drivers of these strategies, with likely candidates including the environmental regimes themselves, as well as the life history traits and phylogenetic ancestry of the species of interest. To address these questions, we parameterised a Bayesian generalised linear mixed model with high-resolution vital rate data from 134 natural populations across 89 species of plants and animals. We show that population responses to environmental stochasticity vary three orders of magnitude along a demographic buffering continuum. Furthermore, the position of a given population along said continuum is predicted by a survival-reproduction trade-off and by the degree of aridity the population experiences. Our findings open a promising avenue of research to improve ecological forecasts and management of natural populations in the Anthropocene.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.1%
6
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.3%
10
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
20
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%