Back

The cellular hierarchy of acute myeloid leukemia informs personalized treatment

Severin, Y.; Festl, Y.; Benoit, T. M.; Wegmann, R.; Hale, B. D.; Roiss, M.; Kienzler, A.-K.; Pabst, T.; Scharl, M.; Sunagawa, S.; Manz, M. G.; Mueller, A. M. S.; Snijder, B.

2024-07-24 oncology
10.1101/2024.07.24.24310768 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by malignant myeloid precursors that span a cellular hierarchy from dedifferentiated leukemic stem cells to mature blasts. While the diagnostic and prognostic importance of AML blast maturation is increasingly recognized, personalized therapies are currently not tailored to a patients individual makeup of this cellular hierarchy. In this study, we use multiplexed image-based ex vivo drug screening (pharmacoscopy) to systematically quantify the drug sensitivity across the cellular hierarchy of AML patients. We analyzed 174 prospective and longitudinal patient samples from 44 newly diagnosed AML patients, which indicated that differences in the AML hierarchy significantly identified poor responses to first-line therapy, outperforming European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. Critically, drug response profiling across the AML hierarchy of each patient improved the accuracy of predicting patient response to first-line therapy (AUC 0.91), and revealed alternative individualized treatment options targeting the complete AML hierarchy of non-responding patients. We confirmed these findings in an independent cohort of 26 relapsed/refractory AML patients, for whom pan-hierarchy response profiling improved response predictions post hoc. Overall, our results quantify the clinical importance of therapeutically targeting the complete cellular hierarchy of newly diagnosed AML, and identify multiplexed image-based ex vivo drug screening to enable quantification and targeting of the AML maturation hierarchy for improved personalized treatment.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.1%
2
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.8%
5
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
9
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
22
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
27
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%