Back

Sequencing 1206 genomes reveals origin and movement of Aedes aegypti driving increased dengue risk

Crawford, J. E.; Balcazar, D.; Redmond, S.; Rose, N. H.; Youd, H. A.; Lucas, E. R.; Sudirman Made Ali, R.; Al-Nazawi, A. M.; Badolo, A.; CHEN, C.-H.; Cosme, L. V.; Henke, J. A.; Hung, K. Y.; Kluh, S.; Liu, W. -L.; Maringer, K.; Micieli, M. V.; Pless, E.; Sombie, A. R.; Surendran, S. N.; Wahid, I.; Armbruster, P. A.; Weetman, D.; McBride, C. S.; Gloria-Soria, A.; Powell, J. R.; White, B. J.

2024-07-24 genomics
10.1101/2024.07.23.604830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The number of dengue cases worldwide has increased ten-fold over the past decade as Aedes aegypti, the primary vector of this disease, thrives and expands its distribution, revealing limitations to current control methods. To better understand how Ae. aegypti evolved from a forest dwelling, generalist species to a highly anthropophilic urban species and the impact of contemporary gene flow on the future of dengue control, we sequenced 1,206 genomes from mosquitoes collected at 74 locations around the globe. Here we show that after evolving a preference for humans in the Sahel region of West Africa, the origin of the fully domesticated, anthropophilic subspecies Ae. aegypti aegypti (Aaa) occurred in the Americas during the Atlantic Slave Trade era and was followed by its explosive expansion around the globe. In recent decades, Aaa has invaded coastal Africa, the ancestral home range, introducing insecticide resistance mutations and an affinity for human hosts. Evidence of back-to-Africa migration is found in regions with recent dengue outbreaks, raising concern that global movement of Aaa could increase transmission risk of arboviruses including dengue in urban Africa. These data provide a platform to further study this important mosquito vector species and underscore developing complexity in the fight to limit the spread of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya diseases.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.