Back

Methodological approaches to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: pastpractices and future recommendations

Virjee, R.-I.; Kandasamy, R.; Garfinkel, S.; Carmichael, D.; Yogarajah, M.

2024-07-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.07.23.604405 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is an implicit, electrophysiological marker of cortical heartbeat processing and interoception, with increasing clinical relevance. However, on the scalp, HEP are low-amplitude signals mixed with cardiac field artefacts (CFA), requiring signal processing pipelines to separate HEP from CFA. This review evaluates current analytical approaches, addresses methodological gaps in HEP pipelines, and examines the impact of key parameter choices. HEP processing methods/parameters used in EEG (N=101) and MEG (N=10) studies were investigated, focusing on the effects of HEP window, electrodes, filters, independent component analysis (ICA) and artefact subspace reconstruction (ASR), on HEP extraction, using Temple Universitys normal scalp EEG data. EEG and MEG studies revealed clear inconsistencies in HEP parameter use and reporting. ASR-20 (ASR threshold for artifact identification) performed comparably to ICA for artefact removal, supporting its potential real-time EEG applicability. Epoch rejection, a HEP quality metric, appeared equivalent between ICA and ASR-20 after artefact removal. Linear Mixed Model analysis identified significant effects of RR interval, maximum epoch amplitude, HEP window and baseline correction start time on measured HEP amplitude. Publications should report critical values for reliable HEP extraction, emphasising the need for standardised methods to enhance study comparability and reproducibility.

Published in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.