Back

Preclinical Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH)

Blankenship, K.; Chang, T.-C.; Fan, Y.; Gordon, B.; Wright, W. C.; Kieffer, M.; Karlstrom, A.; Jeon, J.; Patel, A.; Dapper, J.; Caufield, W. V.; Freeman, B. B.; Federico, S.; Clay, M. R.; Wu, G. G.; Zhou, X.; Hoffmann, L.; Geeleher, P.; Dyer, M. A.; McEvoy, J.; Stewart, E. A.

2024-07-23 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.07.22.604648 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pediatric solid tumors arise from diverse tissues during development and exhibit a wide range of molecular, cellular and genetic features. This diversity, combined with the low incidence of pediatric cancer makes it increasingly difficult to personalize therapy for individual patients based on the unique features of their tumors. Therefore, well-credentialed preclinical models that capture the diversity and heterogeneity of pediatric solid tumors are essential for identifying molecular targeted therapeutics for precision medicine. Here, we report 281 orthotopic patient derived xenografts (O-PDXs) from 224 patients representing 24 different types of pediatric solid tumors. We have performed genomic characterization of the O-PDXs and compared them to their corresponding patient tumors. To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of using such a diverse collection of O-PDXs in preclinical studies, we performed a preclinical pediatric precision medicine trial based on the NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial enrollment criteria. We also tested molecular targeted therapy for a novel oncogenic fusion recently reported in pediatric melanoma and precision drug delivery using nano-liposomal irinotecan. Our studies demonstrate the value of large, well-credentialed preclinical models for future precision medicine in pediatric oncology using single agents, drug combinations and novel drug formulations. Translational RelevanceThis study demonstrates the value of utilizing fully characterized preclinical models of pediatric solid tumors to evaluate the response to precision medicine approaches. Our results demonstrate the importance of performing comprehensive preclinical testing using multiple orthotopic patient derived xenografts to validate and prioritize vulnerabilities identified through genomic or integrated analyses which can be translated into clinical trials. Importantly, this study identified combinations using nano-liposomal irinotecan in a precision drug delivery approach that may benefit pediatric solid tumor patients. In addition, all models and their associated data are made freely available to the scientific community through the Childhood Solid Tumor Network.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
7
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.5%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
17
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
22
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
24
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%