Convergent expansions of keystone gene families drive metabolic innovation in a major eukaryotic clade
David, K. T.; Schraiber, J. G.; Crandall, J. G.; LaBella, A. L.; Opulente, D. A.; Harrison, M.-C.; Wolters, J. F.; Zhou, X.; Shen, X.-X.; Groenewald, M.; Hittinger, C. T.; Pennell, M.; Rokas, A.
Show abstract
Many remarkable innovations have repeatedly occurred across vast evolutionary distances. When convergent traits emerge on the tree of life, they are sometimes driven by the same underlying gene families, while other times many different gene families are involved. Conversely, a gene family may be repeatedly recruited for a single trait or many different traits. To understand the general rules governing convergence at both genomic and phenotypic levels, we systematically tested associations between 56 binary metabolic traits and gene count in 14,710 gene families from 993 species of Saccharomycotina yeasts. Using a recently developed phylogenetic approach that reduces spurious correlations, we discovered that gene family expansion and contraction was significantly linked to trait gain and loss in 45/56 (80%) of traits. While 601/746 (81%) of significant gene families were associated with only one trait, we also identified several keystone gene families that were significantly associated with up to 13/56 (23%) of all traits. These results indicate that metabolic innovations in yeasts are governed by a narrow set of major genetic elements and mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Macroevolutionary diversity of traits and genomes in the model yeast genus Saccharomyces 96%
- Laboratory evolution of synthetic electron transport system variants reveals a larger metabolic respiratory system and its plasticity 95%
- Changes in the distribution of fitness effects and adaptive mutational spectra following a single first step towards adaptation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.