Back

AI-assisted In-silico Trial for the Optimization of Osmotherapy following Ischaemic Stroke

chen, x.; Lu, L.; Jozsa, T. I.; Clifton, D.; Payne, S.

2024-07-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.07.20.604439 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over the past few decades, osmotherapy has commonly been employed to reduce intracranial pressure in post-stroke oedema. However, evaluating the effectiveness of osmotherapy has been challenging due to the difficulties in clinical intracranial pressure measurement. As a result, there are no established guidelines regarding the selection of administration protocol parameters. Considering that the infusion of osmotic agents can also give rise to various side effects, the effectiveness of osmotherapy has remained a subject of debate. In previous studies, we proposed the first mathematical model for the investigation of osmotherapy and validated the model with clinical intracranial pressure data. The physiological parameters vary among patients and such variations can result in the failure of osmotherapy. Here, we propose an AI-assisted in-silico trial for further investigation of the optimisation of administration protocols. The proposed deep neural network predicts intracranial pressure evolution over osmotherapy episodes. The effects of the parameters and the choice of dose of osmotic agents are investigated using the model. In addition, clinical stratifications of patients are related to a brain model for the first time for the optimisation of treatment of different patient groups. This provides an alternative approach to tackle clinical challenges with in-silico trials supported by both mathematical/physical laws and patient-specific biomedical information.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
4
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
11
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
30
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%