Back

Pyramidal neurons proportionately alter the identity and survival of specific cortical interneuron subtypes

Wu, S. J.; Dai, M.; Yang, S.-P.; McCann, C.; Qiu, Y.; Marrero, G. J.; Stogsdill, J. A.; Di Bella, D. J.; Xu, Q.; Farhi, S. L.; Macosko, E. Z.; Chen, F.; Fishell, G.

2024-07-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.07.20.604399 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mammalian cerebral cortex comprises a complex neuronal network that maintains a precise balance between excitatory pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons. Accumulating evidence indicates that specific interneuron subtypes form stereotyped microcircuits with distinct pyramidal neuron classes. Here we show that pyramidal neurons play an active role in this process by promoting the survival and terminal differentiation of their associated interneuron subtypes. In wild-type cortex, interneuron subtype abundance mirrors the prevalence of their pyramidal neuron partners. In Fezf2 mutants, which lack layer 5b pyramidal neurons and are expanded in layer 6 intratelencephalic neurons, corresponding subtype-specific shifts occur through two distinct mechanisms: somatostatin interneurons adjust their programmed cell death, whereas parvalbumin interneurons switch their subtype identity. Silencing neuronal activity or blocking vesicular release in L5b pyramidal neurons revealed that their communication with interneurons does not require voltage-gated synaptic activity and engages both tetanus toxin-sensitive and -insensitive pathways. Moreover, a targeted bioinformatic screen for ligand-receptor pairs displaying subtype-specific expression and reduced expression of pyramidal neuron-derived ligand in Fezf2 mutants identified candidate secreted factors and adhesion molecules. These findings reveal distinct, pyramidal neuron-driven mechanisms for sculpting interneuron diversity and integrating them into local cortical circuits.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.