Back

Using deep learning predictions reveals a large number of register errors in PDB deposits

Sanchez Rodriguez, F.; Simpkin, A. J.; Chojnowski, G.; Keegan, R.; Rigden, D. J.

2024-07-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.07.19.604304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The accuracy of the information in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is of great importance for the myriad downstream applications that make use of protein structural information. Despite best efforts, the occasional introduction of errors is inevitable, especially where the experimental data are of limited resolution. We have previously established a novel protein structure validation approach based on spotting inconsistencies between the residue contacts and distances observed in a structural model and those computationally predicted by methods such as AlphaFold 2. It is particularly well-suited to the detection of register errors. Importantly, the new approach is orthogonal to traditional methods based on stereochemistry or map-model agreement, and is resolution-independent. Here we identify thousands of likely register errors by scanning 3-5[A] resolution structures in the PDB. Unlike most methods, application of our approach yields suggested corrections to the register of affected regions which we show, even by limited implementation, lead to improved refinement statistics in the vast majority of cases. A few limitations and confounding factors such as fold-switching proteins are characterised, but we expect our approach to have broad application in spotting potential issues in current accessions and, through its implementation and distribution in CCP4, helping ensure the accuracy of future deposits.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.