Brain responses to predictable structure in auditory sequences: From complex regular patterns to tone repetition
Southwell, R.; Tufo, C.; Chait, M.
Show abstract
In classical studies of auditory pattern learning, neuronal responses exhibit repetition suppression, where sequences of repeated tones show a reduced evoked response. This may be due in part to adaptation, but is also hypothesized to indicate suppression of expected stimuli. Repetition suppression is thought to form a building block of regularity learning, and is the paradigmatic example of predictive coding in humans and other animals. However, stimuli with more complex patterns appear to show the opposite effect. Predictable regular (REG) patterns distributed over a range of frequencies show a strongly enhanced sustained brain response compared to frequency-matched random (RAND) sequences, sitting at odds with the usual reduced evoked responses to predictable stimuli. A limiting factor in reconciling these findings is that they are obtained using different stimuli and analysis methods. This human EEG study (N=20) brings together auditory sequence predictability and repetition in a single paradigm, based on rapidly unfolding tone pip patterns, incorporating sequences consisting of exactly repeating tones at a single frequency, alongside REG and RAND of varying complexity. We demonstrate that regularity is associated with increased sustained responses, offset responses, tone locked responses and cycle-locked responses. We further show that both repetition suppression and repetition enhancement occur over different timescales, and that sustained brain responses to simple repetition show qualitatively different effects than to more complex regularities during automatic tracking of stimulus statistics. Our results indicate a system for automatic monitoring of predictability in the auditory environment, which is distinct from, but concurrent with, repetition suppression. NEW & NOTEWORTHYWe investigate how human brain response patterns evolve as auditory patterns become progressively simplified, focusing on the impact of sequence structure on various aspects of EEG responses, both evoked and induced. By contrasting EEG responses across different phases of the stimulus--onset, sustained, and offset--we uncover the interplay between repetition suppression and predictability. This approach allows us to discern how the brain processes and adapts to changing regularities in sensory input.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual learning of random acoustic patterns: Impact of temporal regularity and attention 98%
- Carrier-frequency specific omission-related neural activity in ordered sound sequences are independent of omissions-predictability 97%
- Decoding violated sensory expectations from the auditory cortex of anaesthetized mice: Hierarchical recurrent neural network depicts separate 'danger' and 'safety' units 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sustained neural activity correlates with rapid perceptual learning of auditory patterns 98%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
- Decomposing neural responses to melodic surprise in musicians and non-musicians: evidence for a hierarchy of predictions in the auditory system 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of stimulus rate and periodicity on auditory cortical entrainment to continuous sounds 98%
- Strength of low-frequency EEG phase entrainment to external stimuli is associated with fluctuations in the brain's internal state 97%
- Neural signals to violations of abstract rules using speech-like stimuli 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms 97%
- Consonance perception in congenital amusia: behavioral and brain responses to harmonicity and beating cues 97%
- Implicit versus explicit timing - separate or shared mechanisms? 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.