The adoption and implementation of local government planning regulations to manage hot food takeaways near schools in England: A qualitative process evaluation.
Hassan, S.; Thompson, C.; Adams, J.; Chang, M.; Derbyshire, D.; Keeble, M.; Liu, B.; Mytton, O. T.; Rahilly, J.; Savory, B.; Smith, R.; White, M.; Burgoine, T.; Cummins, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionAccess to hot food takeaways, particularly near schools, is of growing concern for policymakers seeking to reduce childhood obesity globally. In England, United Kingdom (UK), local government jurisdictions are implementing planning policies to reduce access by restricting or denying planning permission for new takeaway outlets near schools. We used a qualitative approach to explore local government officers perspectives on the barriers to and facilitators of the adoption, implementation, and perceived effectiveness of these policies. MethodsIn 2021-2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 29 local planning ( planners) and public health government officers from 15 different local authorities across England who adopted a policy to restrict new takeaways. Data were analysed thematically. ResultsParticipants explained that they mostly thought the policies facilitated the refusal of applications for new takeaways near schools. However, participants speculated that businesses identified alternative opportunities to operate including functioning as restaurants or within other locations. Effective working relationships between planners and public health officers were important for adoption and implementation, although planning and public health agendas did not always align and there were tensions between economic development and health improvement goals. The policy was adapted to suit local needs and priorities; in some cases, the policy was not used in areas where economic growth was prioritised. Clarity in policy wording and establishing a formal process for implementing policies including a designated individual responsible for checking and reviewing takeaway applications helped ensure consistency and confidence in policy implementation. ConclusionAlthough sometimes challenging, the policies were commonly described as feasible to implement. However, they may not completely prevent new takeaways opening, particularly where takeaways are relied upon to enhance local economies or where takeaway businesses find alternative ways to operate. Nevertheless, the policies can serve to shift the balance of power that currently favours commercial interests over public health priorities. HighlightsO_LIPlanning and public health officers struggled to align economic and health agendas C_LIO_LIPolicy champions helped align agendas and push takeaway management policies forward C_LIO_LIPolicies were adapted to avoid use where they negatively impacted economic growth C_LIO_LIEstablished processes and clearly worded policies facilitated policy implementation C_LIO_LIThe polices made it easier to deny planning permission for new takeaways C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 95%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 94%
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers 97%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 94%
- Primary school staff reflections on school closures due to COVID-19 and recommendations for the future: a national qualitative survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 94%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 94%
- Qualitative Study of Acceptability, Benefits, and Feasibility of a Food-based Intervention among Participants and Stakeholders of the RATIONS Trial 93%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 94%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 94%
- Impact of relaxing Covid-19 social distancing measures on rural North Wales: a simulation analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.