In-Silico Analyses of Molecular Force Sensors for Mechanical Characterization of Biological Systems
Lopez, D. M.; Castro, C. E.; Sotomayor, M.
Show abstract
Mechanical forces play key roles in biological processes such as cell migration and sensory perception. In recent years molecular force sensors have been developed as tools for in situ force measurements. Here we use all-atom steered molecular dynamics simulations to predict and study the relationship between design parameters and mechanical properties for three types of molecular force sensors commonly used in cellular biological research: two peptide-and one DNA-based. The peptide-based sensors consist of a pair of fluorescent proteins, which can undergo Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET), linked by spider silk (GPGGA)n or synthetic (GGSGGS)n disordered regions. The DNA-based sensor consists of two fluorophore-labeled strands of DNA that can be unzipped or sheared upon force application with a FRET signal as readout of dissociation. We simulated nine sensors, three of each kind. After equilibration, flexible peptide linkers of three different lengths were stretched by applying forces to their N-and C-terminal C atoms in opposite directions. Similarly, we equilibrated a DNA-based sensor and pulled on the phosphate atom of the terminal guanine of one strand and a selected phosphate atom on the other strand in the opposite direction. These simulations were performed at constant velocity (0.01 nm/ns - 10 nm/ns) and constant force (10 pN - 500 pN) for all versions of the sensors. Our results show how the force response of these sensors depends on their length, sequence, configuration and loading rate. Mechanistic insights gained from simulations analyses indicate that interpretation of experimental results should consider the influence of transient formation of secondary structure in peptide-based sensors and of overstretching in DNA-based sensors. These predictions can guide optimal fluorophore choice and facilitate the rational design of new sensors for use in protein, DNA, hybrid systems, and molecular devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEBiomolecular structures involved in various biological processes, including muscle function and sensory perception, generate, convey, and respond to mechanical forces. In-vivo accurate measurement of these forces is challenging but needed to understand biological function. Here we present a comprehensive computational analysis of three different types of molecular force sensors used to report pico-Newton level forces in biomolecular systems. Our atom-level simulation predictions provide mechanistic insight that can facilitate experimental data interpretation, selection of sensor design parameters, and the development of new force sensors tailored to specific applications and environments.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling the Conformational Dynamics of the Histone Tails Using Markov State Modeling 94%
- Competition between stacking and divalent cation mediated electrostatic interactions determines the conformations of short DNA sequences 94%
- Stretching of long double-stranded DNA and RNA described by the same model. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemical-state-dependent free energy profile from single-molecule trajectories of biomolecular motor: Application to processive chitinase 93%
- Structural preferences shape the entropic force of disordered protein ensembles 93%
- Step-wise Hydration of Magnesium by Four Water Molecules Precedes Phosphate Release in a Myosin Motor 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Force-dependent interactions between talin and full-length vinculin 93%
- Inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) accelerates immature HIV-1 Gag protein assembly towards kinetically-trapped morphologies 93%
- Characterizing the conformational free-energy landscape of RNA stem-loops using single-molecule field-effect transistors 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.