Back

Ex vivo functional characterization of mouse olfactory bulb projection neurons reveals a heterogenous continuum

Gadiwalla, S.; Guillaume, C.; Huang, L.; White, S. J.; Basha, N.; Petersen, P.; Galliano, E.

2024-07-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.07.17.603915 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mitral and tufted cells in the olfactory bulb (OB) act as an input convergence hub and transmit information to higher olfactory areas. Since first characterized, they have been classed as distinct projection neurons based on size and location: laminarly-arranged mitral cells with a diameter larger than 20{micro}m in the mitral layer (ML), and smaller tufted cells spread across both the ML and external plexiform layer (EPL). Recent in vivo work has shown that these neurons encode complementary olfactory information, akin to parallel channels in other sensory systems. Yet, many ex vivo studies still collapse them into a single class, mitral/tufted, when describing their physiological properties and impact on circuit function. Using immunohistochemistry and whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology in fixed or acute slices from adult mice, we attempted to align in viv o and ex vivo data and test a soma size-based classifier of OB projection neurons using passive and intrinsic firing properties. We found that there is no clear separation between cell types based on passive or active properties. Rather, there is a heterogeneous continuum with three loosely clustered subgroups: EPL tufted cells, and putative tufted or putative mitral cells in the ML. These findings illustrate the large functional heterogeneity present within the OB projection neurons and complement existing literature highlighting how heterogeneity in sensory systems is preponderant and possibly used in the OB to decode complex olfactory information.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.