Back

Agricultural landscapes with high compositional heterogeneity support both forest and farmland birds in Taiwan

Lin, D.-L.; Amano, T.; Fuller, R.; Ding, T.-S.; Maron, M.

2024-07-18 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.16.603643 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ContextPromoting heterogeneous agricultural landscapes could help to reduce the negative impacts of habitat conversion on biota. However, the benefits of landscape heterogeneity can vary among spatial scales and taxa. ObjectivesTo design biodiversity-friendly landscapes, we use nationwide bird survey data and land use maps to examine the effects of compositional heterogeneity, configurational heterogeneity, and habitat amount at different scales on the species richness of different bird groups. MethodsWe examine the effects of configurational heterogeneity (measured using edge density), compositional heterogeneity (Shannons diversity index of habitat types), and habitat amount (proportion of forest and farmland cover) at both transect (local) and landscape (0.5, 1, or 2 km) scales on the species richness of all breeding birds, forest birds, farmland birds, and introduced birds. ResultsTotal species richness had a hump-shaped relationship with local forest cover, and with farmland cover at landscape scale. Richness of both forest birds and richness of farmland birds increased with Shannons diversity index of habitat types at both local and landscape scales, but only increased with the amount of their preferred habitat at the local scale. Richness of introduced birds was greater in landscapes with higher edge density, suggesting those species are associated with human-dominated landscapes. ConclusionsHigh compositional heterogeneity with low configurational heterogeneity at the landscape scale may help maintain native bird richness while minimising the spread of introduced species in Taiwan. These results can help guide land use planning to achieving biodiversity goals in a country with intensive land-use competition.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.4%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
7
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
13
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
20
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%