Back

Dissecting human monoclonal antibody responses from mRNA- and protein-based XBB.1.5 COVID-19 monovalent vaccines

Fantin, R.; Clark, J.; Cohn, H.; Jaiswal, D.; Bozarth, B.; Civljak, A.; Rao, V.; Lobo, I.; Nardulli, J.; Srivastava, K.; Yong, J.; Andreata-Santos, R.; Bushfield, K.; Lee, E.; Singh, G.; Study group, P.; Kleinstein, S.; Krammer, F.; Simon, V.; Bajic, G.; Coelho, C.

2024-07-16 immunology
10.1101/2024.07.15.602781 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of highly contagious and immune-evasive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has required reformulation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines to target those new variants specifically. While previous infections and booster vaccinations can enhance variant neutralization, it is unclear whether the monovalent version, administered using either mRNA or protein-based vaccine platforms, can elicit de novo B-cell responses specific for Omicron XBB.1.5 variants. Here, we dissected the genetic antibody repertoire of 603 individual plasmablasts derived from five individuals who received a monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccination either with mRNA (Moderna or Pfizer/BioNtech) or adjuvanted protein (Novavax). From these sequences, we expressed 100 human monoclonal antibodies and determined binding, affinity and protective potential against several SARS-CoV-2 variants, including JN.1. We then select two vaccine-induced XBB.1.5 mAbs, M2 and M39. M2 mAb was a de novo, antibody, i.e., specific for XBB.1.5 but not ancestral SARS-CoV-2. M39 bound and neutralized both XBB.1.5 and JN.1 strains. Our high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of M2 and M39 in complex with the XBB.1.5 spike glycoprotein defined the epitopes engaged and revealed the molecular determinants for the mAbs specificity. These data show, at the molecular level, that monovalent, variant-specific vaccines can elicit functional antibodies, and shed light on potential functional and genetic differences of mAbs induced by vaccinations with different vaccine platforms. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=43 SRC="FIGDIR/small/602781v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1000"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7c4708org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11b66acorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1cec7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e72fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.2%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
8
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
12
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
25
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
27
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%