Back

Multi-omics characterization of type 2 diabetes associated genetic variation.

Mandla, R.; Lorenz, K.; Yin, X.; Bocher, O.; Huerta-Chagoya, A.; Arruda, A. L.; Piron, A.; Horn, S.; Suzuki, K.; Hatzikotoulas, K.; Southam, L.; Taylor, H.; Yang, K.; Hrovatin, K.; Tong, Y.; Lytrivi, M.; Rayner, N. W.; Meigs, J. B.; Mccarthy, M.; Mahajan, A.; Udler, M. S.; Spracklen, C. N.; Boehnke, M.; Vujkovic, M.; Rotter, J. I.; Eizirik, D. L.; Cnop, M.; Lickert, H.; Morris, A.; Zeggini, E.; Voight, B. F.; Mercader, J. M.

2024-07-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.07.15.24310282 medRxiv
Show abstract

Discerning the mechanisms driving type 2 diabetes (T2D) pathophysiology from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) remains a challenge. To this end, we integrated omics information from 16 multi-tissue and multi-ancestry expression, protein, and metabolite quantitative trait loci (QTL) studies and 46 multi-ancestry GWAS for T2D-related traits with the largest, most ancestrally diverse T2D GWAS to date. Of the 1,289 T2D GWAS index variants, 716 (56%) demonstrated strong evidence of colocalization with a molecular or T2D-related trait, implicating 657 cis-effector genes, 1,691 distal-effector genes, 731 metabolites, and 43 T2D-related traits. We identified 773 of these cis- and distal-effector genes using either expression QTL data from understudied ancestry groups or inclusion of T2D index variants enriched in underrepresented populations, emphasizing the value of increasing population diversity in functional mapping. Linking these variants, genes, metabolites, and traits into a network, we elucidated mechanisms through which T2D-associated variation may impact disease risk. Finally, we showed that drugs targeting effector proteins were enriched in those approved to treat T2D, highlighting the potential of these results to prioritize drug targets for T2D. These results represent a leap in the molecular characterization of T2D-associated genetic variation and will aid in translating genetic findings into novel therapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.