Back

Spatial patterns of vascular plant species richness in Poland: relations among species group richness and hot spot locations

zymura, T. H.; Tegegne, H.; Szymura, M.

2024-07-17 ecology
10.1101/2024.07.14.603435 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Knowledge of spatial patterns of species richness (SR) is highly relevant for theoretical research in ecology and the development of conservation plans. In Poland, despite a long tradition of botanical surveys, vascular plant SR has not been mapped, nor have the correlations in richness among different plant species groups been explored. Here we used a recently published data set to examine spatial patterns and relationships among the joined SR of vascular plant species, including native species, archeophytes, neophytes, and species with high conservation value (i.e., red list species). The basic spatial unit employed was a 10 x 10 km grid from the Atlas of Distribution of Vascular Plants in Poland (ATPOL). We found that the richness patterns of native species, archeophytes, neophytes, and red-list species were positively correlated. The main patterns of SR and the percentage of particular groups in the joined SR were based on three components: (1) gradient of overall SR, (2) invasion level, and (3) peculiarity of flora in some regions resulting from the high number and proportion of rare species that often have high conservation value. In general, northeastern Poland was species-poor, while the Carpathian Mountain range, the uplands in southern Poland, and some parts of Wisa River valley had the highest SR concentrations. The location of SR hotspots usually did not overlap with the existing system of national parks. The correlations among native SR, high conservation value species, and neophyte SR suggest that biological invasions are among the most important threats to vascular plant diversity in Poland. Finally, we demonstrated that the presented maps, despite likely biases in SR assessments, seem to reflect general ecological gradients influencing vascular plant distribution in Poland.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
3
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
16
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%