Functionally constrained human proteins are less prone to disruption of stability caused by single amino acid substitutions
Andrews, D.; Lehmann, N.; May, M.; Goodall, L.; Cho, E.; Chuah, A.
Show abstract
It is well understood that missense mutations that disrupt protein structural stability are a common pathogenic mechanism in human genetic disease. At a proteome-wide scale, we have quantitated potential disruption of protein stability due to amino acid substitution and show that the most functionally constrained proteins are typically less susceptible to large mutational changes in stability. Mechanistically, this relates to greater intrinsic disorder among constrained proteins, but also to increased B-factors in the ordered regions of constrained proteins. This phenomenon means that constrained proteins exhibit smaller stability effects due missense mutations, and partly explains why overtransmission of pathogenic missense variation is less prevalent in genetic disorders characterised with protein truncating variation. From analysis of the predicted protein stability effects of missense genetic variation across all human proteins, we show that the most functionally constrained proteins are depleted of both destabilising ({Delta}{Delta}G > 0.5 kcal/mol) and overly-stabilising ({Delta}{Delta}G < -0.5 kcal/mol) amino acid variation in disease-free populations. Despite this, amino acid substitutions with large stability effects in functionally constrained proteins are still highly prevalent among pathogenic human genetic variation. Importantly, we observe that there are approximately five times more missense variants with large stability effects than there are unambiguous loss-of-function mutations. Missense variants with disruption of stability effects recapitulate the per-gene patterns of functional constraint observed with protein truncating loss-of-function variation, yet their relative abundance abrogates difficulties encountered when estimating functional constraint for the shortest human genes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Synteny: a high throughput web tool to streamline causal gene prioritisation and provide insight into protein function 94%
- Two sequence- and two structure-based ML models have learned different aspects of protein biochemistry 94%
- Controlling for background genetic effects using polygenic scores improves the power of genome-wide association studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeMAG predicts the effects of variants in clinically actionable genes by integrating structural and evolutionary epistatic features 96%
- Decoding Missense Variants by Incorporating Phase Separation via Machine Learning 95%
- Saturation genome editing of DDX3X clarifies pathogenicity of germline and somatic variation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the Structural Impact of Human Alternative Splicing 95%
- MoCHI: neural networks to fit interpretable models and quantify energies, energetic couplings, epistasis and allostery from deep mutational scanning data 95%
- High-throughput deep learning variant effect prediction with Sequence UNET 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic risk score prediction accuracy convergence 93%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 93%
- IMPROVE-DD: Integrating Multiple Phenotype Resources Optimises Variant Evaluation in genetically determined Developmental Disorders 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.