Lost in Transplantation: Characterizing Racial Gaps in Physician Organ Offer Acceptance
Adam, H.; Bermea, R. S.; Yang, M. Y.; Celi, L. A. G.; Ghassemi, M.
Show abstract
Background.There are known racial disparities in the organ transplant allocation system in the United States. However, prior work has yet to establish if transplant center decisions on offer acceptance--the final step in the allocation process-- contribute to these disparities. ObjectiveTo estimate racial differences in the acceptance of organ offers by transplant center physicians on behalf of their patients. DesignRetrospective cohort analysis using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) on patients who received an offer for a heart, liver, or lung transplant between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. SettingNationwide, waitlist-based. Patients32,268 heart transplant candidates, 102,823 liver candidates, and 25,780 lung candidates, all aged 18 or older. Measurements1) Association between offer acceptance and two race-based variables: candidate race and donor-candidate race match; 2) association between offer rejection and time to patient mortality. ResultsBlack race was associated with significantly lower odds of offer acceptance for livers (OR=0.93, CI: 0.88-0.98) and lungs (OR=0.80, CI: 0.73-0.87). Donor-candidate race match was associated with significantly higher odds of offer acceptance for hearts (OR=1.11, CI: 1.06-1.16), livers (OR=1.10, CI: 1.06-1.13), and lungs (OR=1.13, CI: 1.07-1.19). Rejecting an offer was associated with lower survival times for all three organs (heart hazard ratio=1.16, CI: 1.09-1.23; liver HR=1.74, CI: 1.66-1.82; lung HR=1.21, CI: 1.15-1.28). LimitationsOur study analyzed the observational SRTR dataset, which has known limitations. ConclusionOffer acceptance decisions are associated with inequity in the organ allocation system. Our findings demonstrate the additional barriers that Black patients face in accessing organ transplants and demonstrate the need for standardized practice, continuous distribution policies, and better organ procurement.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Balancing Equity and HLA Matching in Deceased-Donor Kidney Allocation with Eplet Mismatch 94%
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of de novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation 93%
- Direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of kidney transplant recipients: a national observational study in France 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world Effectiveness of 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients 94%
- Benefit and Risk of Endomyocardial Biopsy for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era 93%
- How hostile is prolonged brain death for donor organs in transplantation? A time course analysis using clinical samples 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters against infection, hospitalization and death: a target trial emulation in the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant era 88%
- SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody response and breakthrough infection in dialysis 87%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir among U.S. Veterans: target trial emulation studies with one-month and six-month outcomes 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Return of the Tbx5; lineage-tracing reveals ventricular cardiomyocyte-like precursors in the injured adult mammalian heart 86%
- Coordinated interactions between endothelial cells and macrophages in the islet microenvironment promote beta cell regeneration 86%
- Ischemic tolerance and cardiac repair in the African spiny mouse 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.