Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and maternal SARS-CoV-2 status on breastfeeding practices in the COMBO cohort
Walzer, L.; Nichols, P.; Amoo-Achampong, M. K.; Glassman, M. E.; Kyle, M. H.; Hussain, M.; Abreu, W.; Scripps, T.; Khan, A.; Hanft, E.; Xu, R. L.; LoFrumento, M. A.; Kataria, A.; Stockwell, M. S.; Dumitriu, D.; Fernandez, C. R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the role of prenatal maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic on breastfeeding practices through 6 months postpartum. Study designA cohort of mother-infant dyads who delivered at a large medical center in New York City and who had either documented history of prenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or who delivered in February 2020 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to participate in the COVID-19 Mother Baby Outcomes (COMBO) Initiative. These three groups of mothers completed surveys about their breastfeeding practices at 1, 2, 4, and/or 6 months postpartum, and responses were compared across enrollment group at each postpartum assessment period. ResultsData from 557 mother-infant dyads was included. The SARS-CoV-2 infected group reported significantly lower rates of mostly or exclusively breastfeeding at 1 month, 2 months, and 4 months postpartum. When analyses were separated by birth timing and maternal ethnicity, these differences between infected and uninfected mothers were only significant in the second pandemic wave delivery group and in Latina mothers. Conclusions for practiceMaternal SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was associated with lower rates of mostly or exclusively breastfeeding through 4 months postpartum. These differences may have been driven by delivery timing during the pandemic and self-reported maternal ethnicity. These results suggest a need to increase resources and support for breastfeeding during healthcare-disruptive events such as the pandemic, particularly for those belonging to groups historically underserved in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Breastfeeding outcomes in late preterm infants: a multi-centre prospective cohort study 96%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extremely preterm infant admissions within the SafeBoosC-III consortium during the COVID-19 lockdown 93%
- Family-Assisted Severity of Illness Monitoring for Hospitalized Children in Low-resource settings – a two-arm interventional pilot study 91%
- Prenatal Acetaminophen, Adverse Birth Outcomes, and ADHD: Mediation Analysis in a Prospective Cohort 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inpatient Kangaroo Care Predicts Early Cognitive Development at 6 and 12 Months in Infants Born Very Preterm 94%
- Parental Perceptions of Early Childhood Research with In-Home Monitoring: A Qualitative Study 93%
- From Hospital to Home: Continuity between Skin-to-Skin Care and Later Verbal Engagement in Infants Born Preterm 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of antenatal balanced plate nutrition education for pregnant women on birth weight: a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 92%
- Probiotics and synbiotics administered to young infants: perceptions and acceptability amongst carers and healthcare workers in Western Kenya 92%
- in utero HIV exposure and the early nutritional environment influence neurodevelopment in infants before age three: findings from an evidenced review and meta-analysis. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.