Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer-promoter regulation
Guckelberger, P.; Doughty, B. R.; Munson, G.; Rao, S. S. P.; Tan, Y.; Cai, X. S.; Fulco, C. P.; Nasser, J.; Mualim, K. S.; Bergman, D. T.; Ray, J.; Jagoda, E.; Munger, C. J.; Gschwind, A. R.; Sheth, M. U.; Tan, A. S.; Steinmetz, L. M.; Lander, E. S.; Meissner, A.; Lieberman Aiden, E.; Engreitz, J. M.
Show abstract
Enhancers are key drivers of gene regulation thought to act via 3D physical interactions with the promoters of their target genes. However, genome-wide depletions of architectural proteins such as cohesin result in only limited changes in gene expression, despite a loss of contact domains and loops. Consequently, the role of cohesin and 3D contacts in enhancer function remains debated. Here, we developed CRISPRi of regulatory elements upon degron operation (CRUDO), a novel approach to measure how changes in contact frequency impact enhancer effects on target genes by perturbing enhancers with CRISPRi and measuring gene expression in the presence or absence of cohesin. We systematically perturbed all 1,039 candidate enhancers near five cohesin-dependent genes and identified 34 enhancer-gene regulatory interactions. Of 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power to evaluate cohesin dependence, 18 show cohesin-dependent effects. A decrease in enhancer-promoter contact frequency upon removal of cohesin is frequently accompanied by a decrease in the regulatory effect of the enhancer on gene expression, consistent with a contact-based model for enhancer function. However, changes in contact frequency and regulatory effects on gene expression vary as a function of distance, with distal enhancers (e.g., >50Kb) experiencing much larger changes than proximal ones (e.g., <50Kb). Because most enhancers are located close to their target genes, these observations can explain how only a small subset of genes -- those with strong distal enhancers -- are sensitive to cohesin. Together, our results illuminate how 3D contacts, influenced by both cohesin and genomic distance, tune enhancer effects on gene expression.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Boundary stacking interactions enable cross-TAD enhancer-promoter communication during limb development 98%
- Orphan CpG islands boost the regulatory activity of poisedenhancers and dictate the responsiveness of their target genes 98%
- Precise modulation of transcription factor levels reveals drivers of dosage sensitivity 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- PAX3-FOXO1 coordinates enhancer architecture, eRNA transcription, andRNA polymerase pause release at select gene targets 98%
- Mechanism of homology search expansion during recombinational DNA break repair 97%
- Systematic Dissection of Sequence Features Affecting the Binding Specificity of a Pioneer Factor Reveals Binding Synergy Between FOXA1 and AP-1 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.