Back

From in vitro to in silico: a pipeline for generating virtual tissue simulations from real image data

Nuernberg, E.; Vitacolonna, M.; Bruch, R.; Reischl, M.; Rudolf, R.; Sauer, S.

2024-07-13 biophysics
10.1101/2024.07.12.603259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

3D cell culture models replicate tissue complexity, aiming to study cellular interactions and responses in a more physiologically relevant environment compared to traditional 2D cultures. However, the spherical structure of these models makes it difficult to extract meaningful data, necessitating advanced techniques for proper analysis. In silico simulations enhance research by predicting cellular behaviors and therapeutic responses, providing a powerful tool to complement experimental approaches. Despite their potential, these simulations often require advanced computational skills and significant resources, creating a barrier for many researchers. To address these challenges, we developed an accessible pipeline using open-source software to facilitate virtual tissue simulations. Our approach employs the Cellular Potts Model, a versatile framework for simulating cellular behaviors in tissues. The simulations are constructed from real world 3D image stacks of cancer spheroids, ensuring the virtual models are rooted in experimental data. By introducing a new metric for parameter optimization, we enable the creation of realistic simulations without requiring extensive computational expertise. This pipeline benefits researchers wanting to incorporate computational biology into their methods, even if they do not possess extensive expertise in this area. By reducing the technical barriers associated with advanced computational modeling, our pipeline allows more researchers to utilize these powerful tools. Our approach aims to foster broader use of in silico methods in disease research, contributing to a deeper understanding of disease biology and the refinement of therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.6%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.6%
3
The European Physical Journal E
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
6
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
23
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
27
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
28
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
29
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%