Climate adaptation in P. trichocarpa: key adaptive loci identified for stomata and leaf traits
Klein, M. C.; Meng, Z.; Bailey-Bale, J.; Milner, S.; Shi, P.; Muchero, W.; Chen, J.-G.; Tschaplinski, T. J.; Jacobson, D.; Lagergren, J.; Lane, M.; O Brien, C.; Chhetri, H.; Shu, M.; Freer-Smith, P.; Buckley, T. N.; Magney, T.; Monroe, J. G.; Tuskan, G. A.; Taylor, G.
Show abstract
Identifying the genetic basis of traits underlying climate adaptation remains a key goal for predicting species responses to climate change, enabling the elucidation of gene targets for future climate-resilient crops. Here, we measured 14 leaf and stomatal traits under control (well-watered) and drought conditions, subsampling a diversity collection of over 1,300 Populus trichocarpa genotypes, a potential biofuel feedstock crop. Stomatal traits were correlated with the climate of origin for genotypes, such that those originating from environments subject to water deficit tended to have smaller stomata, but with higher density. Stomatal traits were also correlated with leaf morphology, with larger leaves having larger stomata and lower stomatal density mirrored in correlations to climate of origin. The direction of plastic responses - reduced stomatal size under drought - mirrors the correlations seen among genotypes with respect to the aridity of environmental origin. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identified loci underlying trait diversity, including candidates contributing to stomatal size. We used climate of origin to predict stomatal size in genotypes with unknown trait values and found that these predicted phenotypes confirmed empirically measured allele effects. Finally, we found evidence that future climates may select for alleles contributing to decreased stomatal size, with the strength of selection depending on the availability of moisture. These findings reveal adaptive variation in stomatal and physiological traits along with underlying genetic loci, with implications for future selection and breeding - providing insights into the responses to future climate change. HighlightResearch on Populus trichocarpa reveals adaptation of physiological and stomatal traits linked to drought tolerance, with genotypes from arid regions exhibiting smaller stomata, offering insights for climate change adaptation and sustainable biofuel production.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative water content consistently predicts drought mortality risk in seedling populations with different morphology, physiology, and times to death 96%
- Dissecting Succulence: Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and Hydraulic Capacitance are Independent Adaptations in Clusia Leaves 96%
- Physiological trait networks enhance understanding of crop growth and water use in contrasting environments 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modifying root/shoot ratios improves root water influxes in wheat under drought stress 96%
- Leveraging genome-enabled growth models to study shoot growth responses to water deficit in rice Oryza sativa 95%
- Evolution of frost and drought responses in cool season grasses (Pooideae): was drought tolerance a precursor to frost tolerance? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning enabled phenotyping for GWAS and TWAS of WUE traits in 869 field-grown sorghum accessions 96%
- Uncoupling differential water usage from drought resistance in a dwarf Arabidopsis mutant 96%
- Key traits and genes associate with salinity tolerance independent from vigor in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association identifies candidate genes for drought tolerance in coast redwood and giant sequoia 97%
- Variation in relaxation of non-photochemical quenching between the founder genotypes of the soybean (Glycine max) nested association mapping population 95%
- Temporally resolved growth patterns reveal novel information about the polygenic nature of complex quantitative traits 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.