Back

Multimodal and Quantitative Analysis of the Epileptogenic Zone in the Pre-Surgical Evaluation of Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy

Karimi-Rouzbahani, H.; Vogrin, S.; Cao, M.; Plummer, C.; McGonigal, A.

2024-07-12 neurology
10.1101/2024.07.11.24310242 medRxiv
Show abstract

Surgical resection for epilepsy often fails due to incomplete Epileptogenic Zone (EZ) localization from standard electroencephalography (EEG), stereo-EEG (SEEG), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Subjective interpretation based on interictal, or ictal recordings limits conventional EZ localization. This study employs multimodal analysis using high-density-EEG (HDEEG), Magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional-MRI (fMRI), and SEEG to overcome these limitations in a patient with drug-resistant MRI-negative focal epilepsy. A teenage boy with drug-resistant epilepsy underwent evaluation. HDEEG, MEG, fMRI, and SEEG were used, with a novel HDEEG-cap facilitating simultaneous EEG-MEG and EEG-fMRI recordings. Electrical and magnetic source imaging were performed, and fMRI data were analysed for homogenous regions. SEEG analysis involved spike detection, spike timing analysis, ictal fast activity quantification, and Granger-based connectivity analysis. Non-invasive sessions revealed consistent interictal source imaging results identifying the EZ in the right anterior cingulate cortex. EEG-fMRI highlighted broader activation in the right cingulate cortex. SEEG analysis localized spikes and fast activity in the right anterior and posterior cingulate gyri. Multi-modal analysis suggested the EZ in the right frontal lobe, primarily involving the anterior and mid-cingulate cortices. Multi-modal non-invasive analyses can optimise SEEG implantation and surgical decision-making. Invasive analyses corroborated non-invasive findings, emphasising the importance of individual-case quantitative analysis across modalities in complex epilepsy cases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.