Improving rigor and reproducibility in chromatin immunoprecipitation assay data analysis workflows with Rocketchip
Haghani, V.; Goyal, A.; Zhang, A.; Sharifi, O.; Mariano, N.; Yasui, D. H.; Korf, I. F.; LaSalle, J. M.
Show abstract
As genome sequencing technologies advance, the accumulation of sequencing data in public databases necessitates more robust and adaptable data analysis workflows. Here, we present Rocketchip, which aims to offer a solution to this problem by allowing researchers to easily compare and swap out different components of ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN, and CUT&Tag data analysis, thereby facilitating the identification of reliable analysis methodologies. Rocketchip enables researchers to efficiently process large datasets while ensuring reproducibility and allowing for the reanalysis of existing data. By supporting comparative analyses across different datasets and methodologies, Rocketchip contributes to the rigor and reproducibility of scientific findings. Furthermore, Rocketchip serves as a platform for benchmarking algorithms, allowing researchers to identify the most accurate and efficient analytical approaches to be applied to their data. In emphasizing reproducibility and adaptability, Rocketchip represents a significant step towards fostering robust scientific research practices.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of ChIP-exo peak-callers: impact of data quality, read duplication and binding subtypes 96%
- ChIPbinner: An R package for analyzing broad histone marks binned in uniform windows from ChIP-Seq or CUT&RUN/TAG data 96%
- WACS: Improving Peak Calling by Optimally Weighting Controls 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.